COMMENTARY: Mechagon is gnomes. Undermine is Goblin.
The best place would be if Blizzard made New Gadgetzan canon( the gnome/ goblin NYC theme from Hearthstone)
https://playhearthstone.com/en-us/expansions-adventures/mean-streets-of-gadgetzan/
1 Like
Also Mechagon was xenophobic to all outside life, where Undermine was the most bustling trade capitol of the world right after the events of the 3rd War.
Addendum: the Goblin Cartels we know today are just the follows of the few gang leaders that survived the goblin trade wars.
Goblin lore is so cool and we haven’t even met 90% of the Trade Princes.
Rasto Steamweedle, and Trade Prince Donias have both been mentioned and never touched on again.
4 Likes
Yeah, Undermine isn’t a Horde location, it’s a neutral location. Great place for an expansion.
2 Likes
I’d kill to see undermine fully realized in game.
Massive underground modern city.
Cartel Violence and corporate espionage.
Every vendor is a money laundering business.
And I’d love to have some Villains who are actually smart enough to use stuff like guns and tanks and planes against us.
You’re trying to tell me the Jailor is the smartest most cunning enemy we’ve ever fought with access to the infinite multiverse of the shadowlands, and every single member of his army just casts “death bolt” or swings a polearm? I’m not buying it.
Cartel Xy is more dangerous than that Joker.
4 Likes
I’d love for gang affiliations in Gadgetzan. Players aligning with different gangs could reward different perks. As for Undermine … I can’t wait! I hope both Mechagon City and Undermine take us to the deep core of Azeroth.
I still want Goblin/Gnome customizable Hot Rods!
1 Like
I wish the 19th could come faster so I don’t have to see this incessant bickering every day lately.
1 Like
Huh? Tinkers are both Gnome and Goblin.
If it was playable, I’d open it up to other races as well.
The Tinker hero was a Goblin.
2 Likes
Every single person who says this has no imagination whatsoever, lol.
Even the most boring tinker interpretation is more interesting than “Transform and mash chaos strike”.
5 Likes
Turret based dps, mecha based tanking? Seems pretty original to me.
4 Likes
COMMENTARY:It won’t stop… if we see tinkers coming we’ll have request… like I want them to be able to hold space so they don’t get a double jump but a jetpack.
If we don’t get tinker, we’ll ask for tinker for 3 more years
1 Like
Ah, you’re talking back in Wc3.
Was gonna say, tinkers have been pretty centric to gnomes for quite a while.
Would be fun to see it realized as a class.
2 Likes
I think it more comes down to just not liking the class, or the idea of the class, and people not knowing how to just say so. Or being too afraid to. So the same talking points against them resurface over and over. I haven’t liked Tinker since ever. It’s just not my thing, and never will be. That’s all the reason anybody needs…but this is GD, so…everything must be convoluted!
1 Like
I’ve been wanting a Dragonsworn class or Dragonkin race since BC and I was farming those whelps for a pet. I dearly hope we get it, especially as it’s seemed unlikely for so long, but I do hope y’all also get y’all’s tinkers.
2 Likes
I honestly just want a new class. I don’t care what it is at this point.
1 Like
ya got me with the DH reference…top flight rebuttals!!! My lack of imagination i would say is on par with “let’s add a tinker”….so original. It’s weak and we deserve better!
1 Like
What ever manages the salt flow , I am A OK with
I honestly hope we see a few new classes, specs and a whole new abilities/visual effects mog system.
But Tinker is my dream class.
2 Likes
Agreed.
I think it’d do wonders if they’d establish a development team that was dedicated to customization.
Regularly add in races players want, character customizaton (hair, skin colors, whatever), class skins, developing new classes…there’s even some existing classes that could easily have a spec added on. (Ex : Shaman/Earthwarder tank)
It’d certainly keep the game more lively and attractive.
We’ve got a variety of races and classes that should have been playable way before now and they still aren’t.
1 Like
Yeah. Basically this.
With they way Blizzard chose to make wow, We see Tech Focused Zones and Tinker NPCs all the time.
So, People are going to want tinkers so long as that stuff exists. So they should either add Tinkers as a class, or Retroactively remove every quest, zone, Npc, and object related to Tinkers or Technology in World of Warcraft and all previous WarCraft games.
Tinker is an Iconic class with Roots and History in this game, It is also INCREDIBLY Thematically diferent from every class we already have.
I literally don’t think there could be something better. It is an iconic part of “The World of WarCraft” and it’s not like things we already have.
5 Likes