Dude, nice flip. You’re the one attacking other people’s choices. Noone’s attacked yours.
1 Like
wow you must of taken a course to learn these sick burns. so good
Again we see evidence of the new “warriortard” meme spec in WoW classic.
1 Like
oh i am, ret is a stupid choice. always will be.
and yes you did as well. your attacking me for not being all open armed for people’s bad choices.
you are like the mom complaining to the soccer coach for not using the 1 legged kid. like sure he enjoys soccer but come on.
its amazing how useless you are, please keep typing because it just keeps reassuring my thoughts about you
Funny useless is how your raid is describing you. Next!
Well its fairly rare… the arena has what 5 fights? So assuming that they spawn at the same rate that means one in five runs has the boss.
It is a ten percent chance to drop off that boss as well. So if my math isn’t to rusty that is effectively a 2% drop no?
Even if you farm it effectively with the instance cap you can only do 5 runs a hour.
So it drops about once every 10 hours of running brd. All for a class that can’t actively fulfill the role outside of dungeons and maybe MC if you gimp the raid.
Yes he can hit need but I doubt the community will be glad he did.
did you seriously just say next? so i guess you learned all your sick burns from memes. so original. teach me
Still not disproving the warriortard label.
Attacks others’ choices. Gets called out on it. Claims getting called out on attacking others is itself an attack.
That’s some next level absurdity. Nice one.
1 Like
It isn’t a lack of comprehension… your asking me why a warrior is annoyed that a tank is rolling off spec on a role the tank in question can’t accomplish effectively outside of a 5 man.
I would be annoyed by that it is like watching a hunter need on hand of justice. Just because you can use something doesn’t mean you should snag it from people who can get more out of it.
1 Like
You still don’t get it do you? The warrior complaining had no right to complain because they can tank as well if not better than a paladin even if the warrior is DPS spec. If the warrior wants that chest so badly that they get upset someone else wins it they should be tanking the instance for it.
I mean… yeah, I don’t think tanks should make it easy to get hit with a crushing blow. You don’t need to cap +def, but not equipping full DPS gear makes it… y’know, bearable.
How does this make sense though? I mean to you… Why should one tank to expect dps gear a tank shouldn’t be using?
Again, HoJ is (was before DM) pre-raid BiS for Hunters. You can absolutely be expecting to role against them.
Classic itemization is uneven and ambiguous. It’s one of the game’s strengths IMO. It’s much more interesting. This idea that non-class specific items somehow belong to particular class or spec is completely arbitrary. In a guild, you go by the guild rules for raid loot which are normally structured to best empower the guild as a whole. In a PuG everything is completely FFA.
2 Likes
Why should the warrior who chose not to tank claim rights on gear over the paladin who chose to tank in order to get his dps gear when the warrior can do the exact same thing? Do you need me to put this through Google translate for you or what?
1 Like
Right you can do that but the community won’t necessarily agree with your actions. I know I would frown on warriors tanking the hunter bows.
I just don’t really get the “Screw everyone im gonna get mine” mentality when larger upgrades are more easily accessible.
Pallies are just more annoying because they are healers. Any other role they do you have to actively carry them through it.
Except this happens a lot, and on the forums the Warriors are self-righteous and couldn’t care less. It’s the same in game.
So… Hunters rolling on HoJ pre-DM. It’s their BiS too. They don’t get as much benefit, so they shouldn’t be allowed to roll? So should Rogues not be allowed to roll on any leather that has Strength on it, given Warriors benefit more? Should we have to police these rules for everyone?
Or is it just Hunters, and Paladins?
1 Like
I can understand every word you right. It is just the order you arrange them in doesn’t make sense.
Are you trying to say why should a pally not roll on a item to fulfill a role he can never effectively do over a warrior who can?
The only other thing I can think of is that you have this bizarre notion that tanks have a right to take all of their gear first regardless?
And then expect the dps warrior who missed out to tank to get it lol.
If my reasoning is correct the person believes dps should only get tank gear and tanks get dps gear.