I won 2 pieces of the same lfr loot

I dont know if this is intended or not. I dont stay to wait and see what the rolls are, at least for the last boss, and I got both hand tokens for the set piece in the mail. Someone got screwed out of a piece of gear. :frowning:

3 Likes

If you’re rolling on more than one piece of gear for the same gear slot then you probably should stay just in case you win more than one so someone else can have it.
You just got super lucky is all.

4 Likes

Because GL has no protection on dupe drops and this makes rolling need twice mandatory if you need the gear.

In Pl this is not possible as both items would go to two different players .

Then comes the “if it in your bag it is your loot”, which is true in both cases except that now you own two items in GL and can very well do anything with the extra loot like vend it , thereby denying the second person the loot which they would have gotten if it was PL.

By this fact GL is not a better system than PL

6 Likes

I thought they put protection in so that one person doesn’t win 2 pieces of the same gear.

3 Likes

Its clearly not there , I have seen dupe wins my self in normal runs last week as well. If that is the intent then it should have been hotfixed when they first heard it or at least this Tuesday .

  • Players won’t be able to win multiples of the same item - say that 2 sets of Shoulders drop. While you can roll Need on both of them, winning one will ‘remove’ your roll from the other.
4 Likes

That’s information I’d put in a bug report, as you know that someone on the forums is going to call that an exploit.

2 Likes

Yup not working

Thank the gods then, that in GL that player can just trade away that extra piece then.

I don’t really see the problem here :dracthyr_shrug:

2 Likes

You didn’t even need to trade before. -But being pro GL supporter I know you would deny everything bad about it or even allow yourself to accept it :rofl:

Blizz’s intent was for duplicates not to happen, you should be happy with that, seeing as how you’ve told us multiple times that intent is more important than outcome to you. :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

What a weird thing to say.

Yeah, you would have just had to vendor the loot instead


Only in your world where toxicity doesn’t exists

You can get only one loot in Pl not more than 1 , keep believing that wow is a carebear world :rofl:

If you believe this after seeing evidence of dupes everywhere in the game , including cross loot spec drops . Their intent is very clear to raise rng and make you take as long as it takes to get gear. Being a fan of Blizzard games is fine by trying to speak on their behalf for free is another .

1 Like

I also read they put protection so a person couldn’t roll on a slot piece with a lower ilvl than they had, that’s not the case either.

It doesn’t appear they changed group loot rules at all from what I’m seeing, would very much like a blue post to address this cause it feels like it was mentioned and then not implemented.

Those protections we’re really important to making GL viable in LFR

1 Like

I spend most of my time an a neon glowing lilac bear.
WoW is a carebear world.

But as for your arguments

Here are a few straws.
:cup_with_straw: :cup_with_straw: :beverage_box: :cup_with_straw: :beverage_box:

Go on, I made grasping for them easier for you.

And was linked above.

We all know their execution is poor, why would we expect them to have gotten this working in the first go? Put in big reports, it’ll get fixed.

Thanks for your admission .

If the outcome is the same you won’t mind going back to PL .

If your argument with PL /GL is the difference then it is that difference we are talking about not the outcome.

All loot system have the same outcome , you either get gear or you don’t /It is the path ttat makes ffa pl , gl , nbg and ml matters.

You and other deflecting consistently to the outcome show you can’t justify the path GL takes.

Old Blizzard strategy . Get to the point that is considered unacceptable then try to consolidate on middle ground and make it appear as the players won. Sound like PL and ML where two parts on the opposite end and GL is in between 
huh ?? coincidence :rofl:

:roll_eyes: you keep trying to use this disingenuous line.

The outcome of everyone rolling need on GL vs PL rolling need for everyone is the same.

GL is better for everyone in that as soon a one person passed or greed, everyone else has better odds if they need.

GL is also better without PLs trade restrictions.

Because you keep talking about the out come knowing that we are talking about the difference and since you can’t ignore the fact that players can be corrupt, can be toxic , can behave badly, you and others like you keep deflecting to the "outcome is the same " narrative . This is a you problem