Fantasy lizards are still lizards, and lizards do not have mammaries. The visage form can have whatever gender identifier you want, but the dragon form should not.
28 Likes
If we had a honest poll, you and your opinion would be in the minority. Dragon Ta-tas for the win!
8 Likes
Not too sure we needed another thread of this just to cause a ruckus around here again. lol
Bad Goblin! Bad! No treat for you!
6 Likes
Hiss! Stop it, nasty elfisis!
2 Likes
4 Likes
I can’t play a character that’s not attractive though, I really need to overcompensate for my shortcomings~
It’s why I get so offended by “ugly” races.
2 Likes
Why can’t we have Divinity lizards 
This whole continuous debate has reminded me of these two pictures.
16 Likes
I’d hate for them to do the monstrosity that is female panda. Doesn’t even look like a panda anymore.
What is better?
This…
… or this?
2 Likes
I’ll stick to being an elf.
2 Likes
A hundred times over, the first pic. Those Dracthyr look amazing. That Drakonid does not. 
10 Likes
Sinestra model. Thicker chest. not breasts, but does give an outline.
1 Like
First ones, hands down.
I love Dracthyr. They have that '80s punk vibe. 
6 Likes
And I didn’t mind it. It got its point across without being hilariously out-of-place. Still, I’m glad Blizzard isn’t going that route with dracthyr.
1 Like
and you’d still be right.
1 Like
Incubus reskin is gunna be meh.
Counterpoint.
With how many Humanoid X Dragon relationships have existed in the universe, at this point Dritties™ are a natural evolutionary outcome.
They’re not practical, they’re just like how some birds have really bright feathers. Purely to attract mates.
1 Like
This is the argonian argument, right? The Hist gave female argonians the features of man and mer to make better at infiltration?