I feel like there would be no player Sylvanus loyalists if she wasn't a hot chick

Community General Discussion
1

Let’s face it, she and Nathanus are basically the same, only difference is she’s a hot undead waifu. And everyone hates Natty boy.

28 Likes
2

There’d be a lot less, but there’d still be some.

Source: Garrosh loyalists

28 Likes
3

Either that or a female “yaas girl, boss” . Supposedly “strong female character” that people want to lick the boots off.

5 Likes
4

Not everyone hates him. Why is always a human Paladin making this claim that everyone should feel one way.

I personally hate Anduin and Wraithion, Tryande and Malfurion, I dislike nearly every leader of the Alliance and Horde because they all lack personality.

6 Likes
5

I like Nathanos, he’s an exemplar for me

4 Likes
6

I consider most of my characters evil people. I would have joined the scourge if that was an option. Back when they were considering dishonored status I was going to do that.

1 Like
7

Let’s face it, if you only any character because she’s a “hot chick” you’re pretty braindead to start with.

3 Likes
8

I love nathanos. Idc if he is a self insert, thrall is also one rofl.

Nathanos to me is less abnoxious than thrall, and many other characters in wow.

And as for sylvannas, if sylvannas looked like a lilian voss she qoukd still have followers.

3 Likes
9

I like Garrosh overall. I think they turned him full “evil” too quickly, he had a lot of long term potential to fuel conflict. He was a brash Orc-centric ruler, with daddy issues and some deep seated fears he wouldnt be enough and his people would be slaves again.

There was a LOT of character to work with.

What a waste.

3 Likes
10

Nathanos was nice until his revamp in Legion, which made him a discount Marvel movie quiplord.

5 Likes
11

I think a big part of it is because they’re attracted to her, but I don’t think it’s the only part. A lot of people threw their lot in with Garrosh and he wasn’t a hot chick. But also I think a lot of people were attracted to him too. Hmm.

1 Like
12

Garrosh’s narrative had potential, and some players were - passionately - sympathized with his plight. A shame that Blizzard gave him that nonsensical end, while the real villains (Vol’jin, Baine, etc) are now regarded as heroes.

6 Likes
13

Garrosh determined that was a lie

1 Like
14

You need better role-models.

1 Like
15

That may be true for some but it is not true for me. I am loyal to Sylvanas because of her character, not her gender.

6 Likes
16

Let’s not compare Garrosh and Sylvanas as being the same, both can be rounded up to just being straight jerks but Garrosh at least had potential and nuances to his character.

That’s not so much the case with Sylvanas.

2 Likes
17

Sure, extremely unpopular character is still extremely unpopular though, despite having a few fans.

It’s normal hyperbole to speak like that.

18

Garrosh was Bara as phawk though.

Women wanted him, Men wanted him, Goblins wanted him…

1 Like
19

Loyalist was an interesting option to be a bad guy. I chose it for that reason, not because of how an animated character looked.

20

I mean, people said the same about Sylvanas. She had those potentials too, before she became another villain.

1 Like