I tanked it, ill need on it. If theres no more reason for me to run lfr, then you can wait just a little bit longer for a tank.
Some might see it as such, till we start getting complaints about the game being dead as no one queues for the content or it is âtoo hardâ because people are being stupid/lazy.
The issue is the system needs to incentivize gear players running LFR but at the same time, make sure that people after upgrades can get them without having to roll against those same geared players.
Except that some lower ilevel items ARE actually upgrades (e.g. Rashokâs Heart). The most likely scenario (IMO) is that itâs too technically difficult to determine whether something is an actual combat upgrade or not. So Blizzard gave us the more permissive option to err on the side of leniency.
The only reason transmog buttons exists, is because they wanted to separate it from Greed.
so that greed rollers would be the last option over someone who rolled greed for the mog ( example a paladin cannot roll on polearms as a âneedâ because they are almost always agility so they can only roll greed, but rolling greed
Thatâs feasible, but itâs still separate from Need. That a paladin cannot Need an agility polearm actually is more proof that Transmog is separate from Need as well. Otherwise, they shouldâve been able to Need it.
Again, all of this means squat because there is nothing a player can do about it. But I think thatâs actually a great example of Blizzardâs intent when it comes to the rolls.
What does that have to do with entitled people wanting geared players to not be able to roll at all?
Except that some lower ilevel items ARE actually upgrades (e.g. Rashokâs Heart). The most likely scenario (IMO) is that itâs too technically difficult to determine whether something is an actual combat upgrade or not. So Blizzard gave us the more permissive option to err on the side of leniency.
if its too technically difficult then unless you are going to start simming every single person that gets loot youâll need to just accept that they wanted the piece for whatever purpose they want.
Again in my absence, some other person would have rolled anyway, what did you lose? You are just upset that you donât think some ppl deserve loot and it should auto go to dudes in blues.
Thatâs feasible, but itâs still separate from Need. That a paladin cannot Need an agility polearm actually is more proof that Transmog is separate from Need as well. Otherwise, they shouldâve been able to Need it.
Again, all of this means squat because there is nothing a player can do about it. But I think thatâs actually a great example of Blizzardâs intent when it comes to the rolls.
If blizzard intended the rolls to only be done based on performance improvement, they wouldnât put mog appearances in the raid and it would just all be generic gear from outdoor dailies with raid stats, that way no one would ever be tempted to roll on anything based on its appearance.
it would just all be generic gear from outdoor dailies with raid stats, that way no one would ever be tempted to roll on anything based on its appearance.
They did this with WoDâs LFR and it went about as well as you would expect. No one bothered. lol
They did this with WoDâs LFR and it went about as well as you would expect. No one bothered. lol
amazing, I skipped wod because of real life stuff and I could have told you this would happen
Yeah, WoD was quite a rough patch for everyone involved.
Again, speaking from Blizzardâs intent on what rolls mean, you gave the perfect example. If Need was meant for Transmog, pallies would be able to roll Need on Agi polearms.
However, as Iâve stated before, this doesnât matter except that you canât pretend itâs intended by Blizzard. So who cares? People are gonna rationally think youâre a jerk if you roll Need on a mog. Just live with it and move on.
As far as why put unique mogs in LFR? Letâs say theyâre the same as Normal, Heroic, or Mythic.
Raider: âWhy does my gear look like it came from LFR? Change this, Blizz!â
I am assuming they want the mog, since LFR does have some nice color variations on some armor.
is it really fair for those looking for upgrades to have to go for the full season without?
Theyâre more likely to go longer waiting if they never have those geared toons in the raid that canât actually roll on everything.
Objection â witness is over-exaggerating the impact and number of higher geared players who need no upgrades from LFR
Again, speaking from Blizzardâs intent on what rolls mean, you gave the perfect example. If Need was meant for Transmog, pallies would be able to roll Need on Agi polearms.
Again if blizzards intent with rolls was only for performance improvement, they wouldnât put desirable appearances in the raid, and would only put generic outdoor gear with stats.
However, as Iâve stated before, this doesnât matter except that you canât pretend itâs intended by Blizzard.
you are pretending blizzards intent, and Iâm showing you why you are wrong and you just ignore it.
rationally
irrationally, to be clear. Ive already explained in a million ways why it never mattered who got it, and people keep telling me its not that they didnât get it but that they didnât like who it went to, even though their chances never improve even if I am not there.
Its emotionally charged reaction to seeing who got it that they cant get over, not a rational one since there is no proof their game is improved in any way when heroic raiders get kicked out. or PL comes back or whatever other thing you think is fair.
Raider: âWhy does my gear look like it came from LFR? Change this, Blizz!â
ok, remove appearances from LFR and have them only be in heroic/mythic and maybe normal and watch LFR die , WOD did this
Simple: Transmog /thread
witness is over-exaggerating the impact and number of higher geared players who need no upgrades from LFR
So, this is really a non-issue because the number of people âstealingâ loot is so inconsequential? Great, problem solved and we can close all these threads.
Again if blizzards intent with rolls was only for performance improvement, they wouldnât put desirable appearances in the raid, and would only put generic outdoor gear with stats.
Thatâs silly. What does that have to do with the types of rolls?
you are pretending blizzards intent, and Iâm showing you why you are wrong and you just ignore it.
No, youâre not proving anything. If Need was meant for Transmog as you said, a pally would be able to roll Need on an Agi Polearm. I donât really know how else to explain that to you, but it shows that Transmog is not a Need. Nothing youâve said has proven the opposite. There might be coincidental differences or bad decisions, but you have not logically shown anything to the contrary.
So, this is really a non-issue because the number of people âstealingâ loot is so inconsequential? Great, problem solved and we can close all these threads.
And now youâre over-exaggerating what over-exaggerating means.
But they canât roll need for an agility polearm because the loot restrictionsâŚyou know, restrict them to only being able to roll on certain drops when it comes to the Need roll. The only thing that the Transmog loot roll shows is that it is largely useless because no oneâs going to roll Transmog on a maybe when Need gives them a better chance. And if that pally wants the polearm, they are out of luck unless every eligible player in the raid either has it or passes, or also rolls Transmog, which is rare, but possible.
I do not understand how peopleâŚ
Majority of people in this world are self centered greedy and selfish. Itâs been this way since the beginning of recorded time and isnât ever going to stop.
Yea, I never said it was a good system lol. As Iâve mentioned, I was only trying to prove Blizzardâs intent.
Which you cannot.