So…rogue burst damage which kills you in 3 seconds window and abundant CC tools excess go unnoticed through months…
But hunters mark must be dispellable and short duration because thats too much?
Whats the criteria behind hunters mark? Theres literally NOTHING which counters stealth in this game, one of the only tools is just nerfed at a point that it doens’t make difference if you use or not…
Hunter rep has always been low tho, regardless of how good it is or not. Did you think about any historical context at all or did you just blindly look at numbers ?
This game is all about meta (last AWC prove this), which means the game works through efficiency, mathmatically hunters ARE NOT efficient against rogues.
You said “regardless of how good it is or not” which is a false, a lie a poor opinion.
My answer was about efficiency, if they are less efficient they will not be played;
or do you naively really think that professional players make worse choices for the mere “reputation” of hunters? for the love of the god even you don’t believe it
according to brahmot professional players think like this:
“so hunter is currently the best class but their reputation is not good, i’ll take a worse class that has better reputation”