Hunter survival 10.1 Disappointment?

[Allieddeath-blackrock]

@Bepples-barthilas

You seem to think that factual true-or-false matters are something that can and should be compromised over. It’s like if someone says the sky is blue and another says it’s red; you seem like the kind of person to say “can’t we find a middle ground”. No, on some things we can’t. Sometimes one side is just factually incorrect. In this case I’m correct when I say SV was a ranged spec in Classic and you’re incorrect when you say it was melee or melee-preferring. The spec was simply vastly more proficient when played as ranged.

TL:DR of a section that ended up being way longer than I expected:

• Whether or not SV was ranged in classic is an entirely settled issue. It was ranged. That can’t be disputed or compromised over.
• Whether or not they intended SV to be melee or melee-preferring is debatable. Before 1.7 it’s a maybe, but unlikely. After 1.7, definitely not.

I’m not interested in this line of discussion. This isn’t meant to be offensive or dismissive. It’s only that this has been done before, and more thoroughly, in this thread:

Community Council discussion on Hunter design - #1207 by Allieddeath-blackrock

Community Council discussion on Hunter design - #1127 by Allieddeath-blackrock

I was actually more interested in an evolution of the subject. I find that not only you, but myself, have grown accustomed to our comfort zone which has resulted in stagnation.

I challenge you to address the accord as outlined below.

I will begin by conceding to the fact that the Hunter Class possessed both a sustained and a burst rDPS profile. This admission is made without regard to any gameplay limitations or personal bias.

Now what I need in return is an admission that the Hunter Class also possessed a sustained and burst mDPS profile without regard to any gameplay limitation or bias.