I am torn between these 2 classes. I have tried both and they seem to be fun. Because my limit time, I would like to play only one of those mentioned.
I would play only Surv/mm Hunter or Fire/frost mage. I do not like BM (or any heavy pet class)
Questions
- What spec has more fun/better engaging rotation overall?
- Better mogs and aesthetics?
- Better soloing/survivability?
- Better at pvp?
- Looking better in shadowlands?
- Better lore (Your opinion)
TY very much for this great response since I need a little push in order to choose.
What class would you choose and why?
If you want me to choose for you. I choose Hunter.
2 Likes
I played Mage for 8 years and swapped to Hunter main in BFA. Looking to continue my hunter into SL.
- Fire mage. Hands down. The second would be Frost Mage. Hunter is not fun based on itâs rotation, itâs fun based on itâs simplicity and utility. Being able to be a mobile ranged is so much fun. Fire mage is probably one of the other mobile ranged specs though. Hunter also has long range, knockbacks, a heal, jumps and traps.
- Personal preference. Iâd say MM has a great aesthetic to its abilities especially in SL but overall Iâd say Mage has more visually pleasing aspects. Thatâs actually the big perk of a caster.
- Hunter. Easy.
- This is a question that any answer can be irrelevant at any moments notice. Typically, Frost mage is good at PVP (good track record). Although right now Fire mage is insanely good. Hunter is fun, I really enjoy the ârun and gunâ style of play. I really dislike casters in PVP when youâre being focused itâs just not fun.
- MM hunter is looking very good to me personally, excited to get it. Each hunter spec looks better in SL than it is in BFA. Mage looks worse off overall, each spec looks worse in SL than BFA.
- Mage. Not much to really say here, hunter doesnât have a huge lore background to me personally.
IMO go hunter.
Fire mage.
Who doesnât want to chuck massive cinderbursts at people and watch em ignite.
Go druid. better than both
1 Like
I find survival hunter to be fun, itâs a nice take on the hunter class. Feels unique and keeps you on your toes dps wise.
1 Like
Ty guys for all your responses. It seems hunter sounds more convincing
This. Hunter is so much more fun and you wonât be made of glass like mages.
1 Like
Mage, You get portals, food and your class is usually always pretty good. Blink is an amazing movement option/stun remover in dungeons, and Ice Block is leagues better than turtle shell.
1 Like
If you donât want to touch BM, just go mage. MM is a clunky mess and Surv just shouldnât exist, but that is just my personal bias. Either way, neither can hold a candle to Fire Mage.
Well, Iâm surprised to see so many people pushing towards Hunter⌠but then again Iâm a hunter too.
Hunter Pros:
- Really good at soloing thanks to the pet.
- Decent utility across the board, has an answer for everything.
- SV is melee, but can be almost completely ranged when it needs to be.
- SV is currently the best (generally speaking) hunter spec for PvP.
- SV is very mobile.
Hunter Cons:
- MM and SV are middle of the road at best in BfA. I expect the same to happen going in SL, or worse if we donât get more changes.
- MM is a really slow spec. Your main source of damage will be Aimed Shot going in SL, and you wonât be able to move much as a result.
- BM is the all-mighty spec for hunters. If you donât do PvP, then youâll still have that nagging feeling that BM would outdps you ten-fold with 3 buttons.
Mage Pros:
- Really unique and useful tools like portals and food. I canât tell you how great it feels to teleport wherever you want.
- Better utility in general than hunters. Ice Block > Turtle, Shimmer > Disengage/Cheetah, stuff like that.
- Both Fire and Frost out-damage SV and MM, and itâs likely to continue into SL.
- Fire has a super satisfying playstyle with the huge instant pyroblasts.
- Fire ends up being more mobile than MM thanks to the short cast time on Fireball.
- Frost is⌠Okay, Iâll level with you, I never play frost. I hear itâs really powerful too though, and it looks like itâs more mobile than MM too.
- Not as overpopulated as Hunter.
Mage Cons:
- Really squishy class. You will struggle to solo most content once you ding max level unless you get really good at using your mage toolkit. If you do get good, it should be about the same as Hunter if you ask me.
- Not as mobile as BM or SV hunter.
- Arcane will likely be a dead spec for you. I personally love it, but most players find the playstyle at odds with Fire/Frost, and it doesnât always perform that well.
Fair warning that I main SV and Arcane, so I am biased towards SV and I donât have as much experience with Fire and Frost.
In general though, if you care a lot about having high damage, then mage is a much safer choice. SV is rarely touched outside of PvP since Legion, and MM is just literred with problems. Fire and Frost on the other hand are usually good and powerful specs in anything.
If you go hunter, you may be pigeonholed into playing BM, assuming you play higher level PvE content.
1 Like
Thank you for this response. If you had to choose one which one would you choose and why?
I love arcane so I am with that spec. Actually I like the 3 mage specs while hunter I like only MM and SV
I am all in for hunter but BM is my favorite spec by a good margin. Other two can be fun, SV has its moments, but BM is ranged and mobile.
Honestly I wouldâve picked Mage.
I donât know, Hunter is nice and all but thereâs an objective âbest specâ in the form of BM, and itâs not even a spec I enjoy. I only play it now because I have my fingers crossed for changes in SL for my SV spec. The class in general is just littered with issues from Legionâs spec-focused design and it really hurt MM and especially SV. I donât think the dev team even knows what to do with SV anymore, as it has gotten 3 reworks in the last 3 xpacs.
Hunter in general just gets constantly reworked, so you canât get attached to the playstyle you love.
Mage is always powerful, and the specs have remained constant for a while. They donât change much from xpac to xpac so if you want a long time choice, then Mage is objectively better. You donât have to worry about losing the playstyle you love as much, and the 3 specs arenât usually far off damage-wise. It only loses in the soloing department against Hunter.
Plus hah, you like all 3 mage specs! That alone is a really big plus for picking mage if I was in your boat.
Pets are such a huge part of the Hunter class fantasy, itâs hard to imagine the class without them. Times have changed, sure. And chainmail mog is pretty meh compared to cloth.
Iâd go Mage.
Hunter. Thereâs a bloodlust pet, thereâs a water walking pet, thereâs a pet pet. Hunter.
Slow fall pet. Healing pet. Hati pet.
Hunter has survival, which is cooler than all the lame nerd non-melee of mage