How to resolve the boosting community issue without punishing the player base

Just a suggestion for blizzard if they bother to read.
however i think the boosting issue can be solved and the player base kept happy with 2 simple fixes/changes.

  1. Revert heirlooms back to their original state of bonus xp, people were more inclined and excited about leveling with the old heirlooms as the xp bonuses were great for alts, i think if the changes have shown us anything its what a mistake changing them in the first place was. Time to revert them back to xp bonus splendor and do away with the terrible changes we were given.

  2. provided change one was done so people have a legitimate fair way to speed level alts, Xp could be nerfed into the ground for all players grouped up X or more levels apart, this would resolve the issue of grouping with higher levels to be boosted and encourage play and grouping with players around the same levels. what that range is i don’t know but maybe 5 would be fine?

Either way with these 2 simple changes you fix the issue or power leveling without punishing anyone and fix an error that shouldn’t have occurred to begin with.

Why not just ban the boosting communities outright? oh, wait, because they bring in millions of dollars in token sales. that’s all that needs to be said here.

Because they already did?

Problem is that you can’t police behavior on external apps outside the game.

The “boosting communities” took a massive hit a few years ago. Yes, basically they still exist, but not at the level it used to.

Besides… what exactly is wrong with the practice right now? What is breaking the game for players?

Blizzard did add outright bans to it and in vague description lol. This solves the issue without hurting anyone and fixes a wrong.

Gimme my playable heirlooms back for levelling alts!

Besides the constant:

In game mail spam
Calendar invite spam
Discord DM spam
Group finder spam
every in game chat in existence spam

i cant think of anything…

1 Like

That’s why I think my suggestion is the one that’s needed. It solves the issue and allows people to still level alts faster naturally.

1 Like

You know this happens to you because you [edit: “most likely”] have engaged in their services before or have interacted with someone in that community right?

Here’s a hint:

^^^ That isn’t Blizzard’s territory, and you have to friend or follow someone or some specific Discord to get that.

Regardless, spam in-game is a part of what online gaming is. There isn’t a single online game in existence that doesn’t have it. There are plenty of addons to help you filter all that out.

yeah, but if you just eradicate them, there’d be no reason for them to try to add people as friends

“Boosting” doesn’t tend to mean power leveling, though. People might do that, but you can pretty much powerlevel solo now and that’s not what most mean anyway.

“Boosting” = “Paying gold for a carry.” I don’t really care if people do this but I reserve the right to think such people are paying to not play the game. I’d rather play for my mediocre gear than spend money that buys gold to get a slightly higher ilvl or otherwise skip the point of most content.

I don’t know about everyone but I essentially play in order to upgrade my gear. Once I hit a gear plateau I start bringing up alts. So paying for a carry would only cause me to abandon a character quicker, and for that reason it’s silly to me.

But other people can have at it, I won’t care. But I also wouldn’t care if they banned carries, what with it not affecting me either way and all.

1 Like

i havent gotten a single one so far idk why you’re getting constant spams bud

1 Like

oh dope since its not happening to you it must not be happening at all!

All of that aside from the discord one is a banable offense however. The last point only if its done outside the service trade channel.

All of what you said, at least on EU, are all RMT sellers and those couldnt care less if you just bann them. They would just return with a new account.

all the ones i see and read say “gold only” so that doesn’t scream like RMT to me on the US side.

I play on a high populated server and I never get in game mails, Discord spams ( has nothing to do with blizzard, leave spamming servers). I also never seen calendar invite spams or almost anything you mention here. “every in game chat spam” is also an exaggeration, you can just leave the chat channel they are spamming or put in on a different tab.

As i said: EU. If they are indeed boosters for gold (and it not just being a bait to lure you into RMT) then they are still breaching the rules if they advertise anywhere but the service trade channel. So Blizzard did already outlaw it, just their execution of said rules is lacking.

How do any of these break the game for players?

If people wanna waste their resources getting boosted have at it as far as i care.

On topic, you can level cap from starting levels in a few days as it is without playing 24/7, i could only imagine how fast leveling would be if looms got reverted back to their old good selves :eyes:

Wouldnt say break the game but calendar invites can start to get annoying really quickly. For Group Finder there are at least filter addons.

1 Like

Dragon flight leveling is good that being said the new player experience is bad for multiple alts / veteran players so giving xp boosts back to heirlooms is a good fix/bandage but truly the focus needs to be on-boarding new players and fixing the early game experience

Wouldn’t mind an heirloom revamp. The rested bonus thing seemed to be a rushed idea. Quick fix to replace the xp bonus removal. When they should have just buffed the stats to make up for the xp nerf, instead of some gimmicky rested xp thing. Power leveling was always a thing since TBC days at least. Until Blizz nerfed just about every way folk used to do it anyways.

Except that there’s nothing to fix, people being power leveled has no negative impact on the game. Nobody cares, worry about your own toon Karen.

Also, you’re confusing boosting with power leveling, they are not the same thing.