One of the things that I was curious about moving into this new age of WoW where the PC is more acknowledged within the story, “Highlord,” “Maw Walker,” “Champion of the Dragonflights,” and seemingly has some standing with the main characters.
How much influence comes with these titles for bringing up things we discover or notice about other characters?
Example would be:
In the Enemy Infiltration - Preface book we find in the Shadowlands, two excerpts from this book read:
The adherents to Life are the most insidious of opponents, perhaps because their nature is so antithetical to our own.
Still, we learned much from observing the link between their plane and Ardenweald, and we have high confidence that a vulnerability has been identified.
Our operative has already gained the trust of her target.
Similar to the titans, the naaru and their keepers are singular in purpose. Their adherence to a linear path is an obvious shortcoming.
They savor nothing more than being proved right, so if they believe they have converted one of us to their precious Light, they will trust that agent implicitly.
We have two instances where the Dreadlords have seemingly admitted to successfully infiltrating their spies into the ranks of Life and Light.
Light being probably the most notable one at this given time considering we’re going into the Void theme expansions.
While we, as the people who watch Blizzcon, know some of the things to come…
To what degree could (should?) our PCs bring something of this nature up to the likes of Thrall, Jania, Khadgar and Turalyon?
- For example, as the Highlord Paladin, could I pull rank and banish Lothraxion from Azeroth?
- As the Archmage would Khadgar respect the findings of this book and call a council meeting to discuss the matters within?
Obviously, the same goes with the books found for Azshara and Odyn, etc…