The 17 fragment guy is on the pally discord too. I think it checks out, he wouldn’t lie there or get called on it. I have 5 but we don’t raid for the week until tonight. Full cleared every week up until this point.
1 Like
It’s not parse shaming. It’s using parses and logs to prove the OP is telling lies. Re-read what I wrote slowly, reference a dictionary if need be.
1 Like
If you can’t argue a point, use an emoji.
1 Like
Whats to argue? I made an assertion and you validated that assertion. I guess if I had better manners I could have thanked you for agreeing with me, but calling you a clown seemed more satisfying. I’m comfortable with my choice.
1 Like
Please point out where I shamed the OP for parses, rather than pointing to parses to prove “about 6 hard modes” were in fact not being killed by their guild.
First lets define parse-shaming. I suppose I’d say its using parses and/or logs to mock, belittle, insult or discredit a player and/or that player’s opinion…ya know…shame them somehow.
You used parses and/or logs
to shame them
Perhaps you could provide your definition of parse-shaming, possibly I have a misunderstanding of the term.
Claiming their guild is doing “about 6 hard modes” and “full clears” is not a statement of opinion. It’s a statement of fact. I simply proved that claim was false. Try again
/sigh
Do you not understand what is meant by “and/or”? You were absolutely trying to discredit their claim, you admit it. And what was the basis of reasoning for discrediting their claim? A review of their parses/logs, which you also admit.
Now I know conjunctions are difficult for you, but you need to provide a definition of parse-shaming that somehow manages to allow you to use parses to shame someone or stop being offended that I called you a parse-shamer.
People like you are so disgustingly predictable…you love to be toxic and offensive but get so butthurt when you are called toxic and offensive. Now scurry on back to your TV, OAN will no doubt have some riveting content for you to consume and you’ll forget all about this embarrassing episode.
1 Like
The classic 2 Forum characters arguing amongst themselves. Neither brave enough to show us who they really are.
1 Like
Imagine parse shaming from a retail alt lol.
1 Like
Imagine being unable to read and comprehend basic sentences lol
1 Like
OP didn’t do a full clear week 1 nor is he doing 6 HM’s by now (on 25 man). Fishfeast checked logs to point this out, he didn’t parse shame. The fact that he posted it on an alt is irrelevant. Sheesh.
1 Like
And if I gave you that information…what would you do with it?
1 Like
Comedy gold!
1 Like
Still waiting on your defintion of parse-shaming btw…going to lunch, hoping you’ll have something when I get back.
I shouldn’t have bothered replying. Actual clown this guy.
1 Like
Well you would at least be a credible classic wow player and not just a forum troll.
Parse shaming would be shaming someone for their performance in parses. He isn’t doing that, he is shaming OP for lying on the forums and is simply using parses as evidence.
1 Like
I think my definition is better but if thats the position he is arguing from then I can at least understand where he is coming from. Sad that he couldn’t articulate such a simple concept, although its right in-line with my vision of him.
Anyway, thanks for the clarification.