do you often base your whole opinion off one data point? Rofl
How about you and everyone unsubbing / rerolling make a better choice and not care so much about how the opposing faction gets access to a mini-game, just enjoy the main focus of the devs and do your PVE content!
Honestly, anyone who seriously quits because of this change, the game is better off without them. Good riddance.
This statement has âFlat Earthâ energy.
Ridiculous. Itâs not like Blizzard makes server populations public with minute to minute updates and they certainly donât give us sub numbers for each faction. All we can do for acquiring data is observations at this point. Do I wish we had a better alternative? Sure.
Iâve seen multiple forum posts, guilds, and friends all say they were unsubing over it. Itâs happening whether you like it or not. We just donât know how widespread it is based on a small sample size.
This really is the entire problem. TBC and retail should be separate subscriptions and this would solve the problem entirely. Get rid of the retail tourists.
Anyone who quits over a pvp mini-game, good riddance they are bad for the community.
âWSG - 35 minutes
AB - 37 minutes
EoTs - 34 minutesâ
Still too long. Bring back HvH. Horde were only real competition anyway.
Horde still outnumber Alliance on OCE, this change will make it worse if implemented. Theres a decent pop that knew the queue times would make Alliance worth it over losing out on hordes numerous advantages.
So looking at Ironforge pro (the data that we have) its roughly 150,000 (54%) horde to 135,000 (46%) alliance. A portion of both population sets PvP.
because you saw lets say 10 forum posts about people unsibbing, not knowing if they truly unsubscribed or if they are just expressing their frustrations - You extrapolate that to the wider audience and assume âWOW must be thousands of retail players leaving, KNEW ITâ
These numbers are actually based on warcraftlogs, the numbers will continue to rise as people cap and get into their first raids(if that guild/pug even logs their raids)
Also untick EU and Russia. Only 1% difference but yeah.
I havenât queued any BGâs because Iâm waiting to see what Blizzard is going to do. If they donât do HvH queues Iâm gonna go back to PvE spec and finish my gear but if they do do the change then Iâll continue PvP spec and finish my honor gear. Iâm so poor I donât want to pay for the respecâs so Iâd rather just wait to see what Blizzard does lol.
/raises hand timidly in the back:
UmâŚyes we could. Dude. I was here in '07. This is all going down EXACTLY how it went down the first time.
Basically how I feel about it. Itâs an attempt to try to be edgy and fit in.
Thatâs semantical, the point Iâm illustrating is that hes taking maybe a dozen posts and extrapolating it to hundreds of thousands of people as a blanket behavior. Hes poorly expressing his personal opinion and applying it to others without any solid evidence.
lol right, left my horde toons with 6k gold and titles to go ally for queues
This data is based off people raiding, which horde apparently donât do as much since they played the game solely for pvp. Itâs not an accurate set of data to extrapolate from. Itâs too bad Blizzard broke the server population addons.
Oh I know, I wasnât having a go at you or anything, you made a good point. I just see alot of Alliance try and use that website for their PVP arguments when its gets its numbers from PVE logs. Quite funny.
This is incorrect I am queing bgâs from 10 am onward and its like 30 to 40 minutes a que. When itâs evening times its closer to 50 minutes to an hour. Also not to mention that every que pop today has been alliance premades
I will take bad opinions for 500 Alex.
Agree with this one though.
So youâre telling me there are even more Horde players than represented? Meaning queue times will be bottle necked and remain long regardless of your few âim unsubbingâ posters?