Have to give credit where credit is due. I was on my 111 warrior and the Alliance 120s don’t attack me. Multiple instances where I was in Vol’dun and they just rode past me.
They were assaulting the temple of the devoted and one hunter started attacking me until he realized I was only 111 and stopped.
Then, in Nazmir, a 120 druid and shaman didn’t kill me.
I must say, they are more honorable than me because I would have killed me.
Lol, with scaling and my abilities to still use my legendaries, its the opposite when I see a 120 by themselves (understand this wasn’t the case with you as there were multiple) and I am leveling! Go for it!
There isn’t anything honorable about engaging or not engaging in wPvP. For there to be honor involved would imply there are rules. And as someone above said, a 111-115 player with legos can demolish a 120.
My point was that there are gripes against people ganking lowbies. They didn’t gank me which surprised me.
Blah blah blah. How you or others define it is not the point of this post. The purpose of my OP isn’t to define honorable combat on a community scale so telling me whether it actually is honorable or not is irrelevant.
I felt it was honorable and so I stated it as such but the definition was not the main point. Not sure why everyone keeps zeroing in on that one aspect of my post.
I would not go out of my way to kill low players such as going to old zones, but if I happen run across you and we are both in war mode then it will be death for one of us.