You didn’t know RP was doubled and decay. Therefore how can you get any correct answers?
You use equations in the spreadsheet to answer “basic questions” moron. You’re using a piece-wise summation for a decay model that can be trivialized into one computation.
LOL.
You tried to flex on people and got basic variables wrong…
So because YOU think I didn’t know the correct SPECIFIC variables I don’t understand the system?
That’s like saying I don’t understand how to use Newton’s law of gravity because I didn’t know the gravitational constant off by heart.
LOL.
Yeah I think if you don’t know basic variables it doesn’t matter if you can plug them into a simple equation.
You will get wrong results…
It doesn’t matter.
The variables were defined to be “10%” which yielded the correct answers for those variables.
You however can’t grasp the notion of “proof”
Where’s the bluepost that states the double RP and double Decay? Blue drift didn’t include a source.
Except you still claim R14 is possible in 5 weeks when it isn’t…
It is, you earn more than 13k RP. Any high warlord can attest to this fact.
If you understood (or even took a differential equations course) you would understand what “RP gains are linearly dependent on the population” means.
But you don’t…
You asked where the decay numbers came from so I was just demonstrating…. Since you were oblivious.
Also for any curious souls you can through pretty straight forward manipulation transform the general form of the kind I’ve used to a general form describing a generic initial rank value and likewise obtain the form Nttiton has provided. For details see (delete the %),
http%s://ibb.co/HVLY97v
1 Like
Good to have some people capable of basic math skills.
More formal you can prove for all integers n >= 1
(no latex here)
cp sum of i=1 to n = cp ((1-(1-d)^n)/1-(1-d)) = (cp - cp(1-d)^n)/d = cp/d - cp(1-d)^n/d
=> Ro(1-d)^n + cp/d - cp(1-d)^n/d => (1-d)^n(Ro - cp/d) + cp/d
using the fact that this geometric series applies
s = a + an^1 + an^2 + an^3 + … + an^k = a((1 - n^k)/(1-n))
just a shortcut in your derivation, you used a verbose expansion step after the second process
You gonna retract your statement that people were wrong in your original post or pretend you didn’t screw up?
My equation is not wrong, neither is what I said.
keep looking at this thread, you mathematically inept child.
You said R12 couldn’t be obtained in 3 weeks whether you remember or not, and clearly it can.
You said 2 resets isn’t just 1 week off from R12 when 2 + 1 = 3 or is basic math hard?
It’s still there in your post.
I said R12 couldn’t be obtained with a 10% decay within three weeks. It can’t.
That is not what it says. You said people were just wrong when you in fact were wrong.
Just pretend you weren’t though I guess.
I have an engineering degree too BTW and probably have practiced way longer than you.
I just don’t feel the need to flex on a gaming website to make me feel relevant.
You’re arguing semantics, please get off this thread.
Let the real men that can derive simple decay equations handle this.
I don’t care how long you’ve practiced. I have published research under IEEE for IEEE754 and FPGA design as an undergraduate.
Reword your post so you don’t sound wrong then.
My post makes absolute sense, the variables are defined.
The proof still isn’t there that there’s a 40% decay. I will figure it out on my own next week when I decay without earning any RP.
You have wrong variables and wrong conclusions in your original post. If we are talking about SoM.
Weren’t you taught to check your work in school?