for the current hpal mains, just wondering how much better Lightsmith really is compared to Herald [e.g., if you could rate each on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being the highest]?
I think I recall Bubblebuddy mentioning that Herald is only just as good or potentially better when playing into rot comps if you can spam holy lights or something to that nature, but wondering if there is a bit more to it than that [e.g., are there just some comps where herald is objectively bad?]; [e.g., is Lightsmith just better because it contributes more damage and/or healing?].
I see that the majority of the top hpals in shuffle are playing Lightsmith, but is it really significantly better overall?
The main reason I ask is because I received a lot of trash talk along the way [e.g., throughout at least a handful of lobbies in the 2200-2350 mmr range], sometimes even before the first round would start (but usually after a lost round or two), along the lines of “you’re griefing by playing herald”, “this hpal is herald for some reason, absolute trash”, “why are u herald, u trolling?”, etc.
Since the trash talk was mostly after losing a round or two, just wondering if it was fair to consider me to be trolling or griefing by playing herald [e.g., perhaps in some comps it would be considered trolling or griefing?], or if this trash talk was more likely a case of people being salty after a loss and looking for the easiest external factor they could blame the loss on?
Anyway, idk, herald feels pretty solid to me overall and to the extent that I don’t feel like it’s griefing or trolling to play it against any comp (imo of course), but definitely curious to know from the current hpal mains if this is actually the case.