There weren’t, by the time it became alliance dominated it was because the sides turn PVP servers into 1 faction PVE servers.
Enjoy never having PVP HC.
Wow, this guy is lecturing me.
2 Likes
+1 for a PvP Server
4 Likes
I would play HC PvP, I like the challenge and understand that there’s a huge probability I will die. That’s fun for me…
Just because you probably won’t have fun, doesn’t mean others will not. People always claimed mounts on Classic wouldn;t ever go to levels 20-40 instead of 40-60, and they did.
+1 HC pvp server
6 Likes
I would love it, it would be a hilarious rogue grief fest for the week it lasted.
Hunter’s Mark and Eagle Eye/Eye’s of the Beast. I love Hunting Rogues… sounds like a challenge for me and my other Hunter Buddies.
+1 HC PvP Serverrrrrrr
5 Likes
I wouldn’t personally play on a HC PvP server, but if you’d enjoy it I’d support one existing.
Fight the good fight.
Also the inevitable kvetching that would result from people getting yanked would make for some entertainment
3 Likes
I think Classes in Vanilla/Classic are much more Paper/Rock/Scissors than people want to believe. Ret Paladin versus Rogue the Paladin will win usually unless the rogue is talented and probably Assassination/Bleed and Poison specc’d. So imagine a Party with 5 paladins versus 5 rogues, because rogues take much more of a set up to fight their fight the paladins (esp Human with Stealth detection and Consecration etc.) will almost always win.
Being afraid of Rogues ganking you sounds like you just don’t like PvP at all to me. That’s okay if you don’t, it’s not for everyone.
Add me to the list of people that would play a HC PVP Server. Sounds chaotic and fun
4 Likes
If they made a few changes to rest XP, leveling speeds, and made the zones choose what levels flagged (as in my OP) maybe you might think it’s less foreboding and more fair PvP. This would feel much more like a MOBA, but with perma death.
2 Likes
Can confirm Hunter’s Mark right into an Aimed Shot when I am not seeing you stalk me is GG for me.
But don’t let me catch you slippin’ either!!
+1 pvphc
4 Likes
Without making any suggestions, and as a curiosity, what would you think of a Hardcore PvP server but in The Burning Crusade?
I’ve read that TBC has the most balanced pvp between classes, I as a rogue enjoyed it quite a lot, however, I hated the flying mounts because they made the world less interactive and took a back seat. Do you think in a TBC client it would be more ideal for a Hardcore PvP server (without flying mounts :P)?
2 Likes
If a HC PVP realm was added it would be nothing but druids and rogues.
Fixed that for ya.
That’s speedrunning dead server.
1 Like
The only way this works is if you can casually level to 60 in a few hours of play a night. Roving bands of good time ruiners will exist at all levels, the servers will become one sided, then y’all will be in here crying about how no one is playing. HC PvP is DOA.
2 Likes
Sure, enjoy the 7 people that play there.
The 5% are hpals?
1 Like
Why are you telling everybody youre a streamer lmao we dont care
2 Likes
I’ll just post this down here again since most of the more recent comments are people complaining it would be a dead server due to pure ganking from higher levels.
If you took the time to read the OP you’d know a proposition was added that changes PvP engagement rules. This can be coded in a way to make the engagements more fair and fun, and keep the higher levels as only scouts or anti scouts for other players their levels in a lower level zone.
Also Speeding up the leveling was talked about as well…
Upgrading Guards levels and Stealth detection so making large “Warbands” to get to these Flight Paths will be like fighting your way to safety.
In this way, each PvP Zone will be at war with Fairer PvP.
11 Likes
if HC PvP made any sense they would have released them at the same time as the PvE servers. it’s not gonna happen
I disagree.
There is clearly interest. This is one of the biggest posts on the HC Forums.
1 Like