These entitled people basically already know most people will chose to play tbc over classic so they talk down tbc. Imagine being this selfish
1 Like
At least most would try out TBC HC I think, but then if there’s no HC TBC I imagine most just playing TBC anyway 
I know I won’t - at least not until the future of TBC is decided. A HC for TBC might make me change my mind.
The same denial that so many people said HC vanilla would never work?
1 Like
The difference is that HC Vanilla was proven as a proof of concept by the HC addon users.
People tried it on TBC and Wrath servers and barely anyone played it because HC on those xpacs is dumb.
Are you referring to end game raiding on TBC?
You know where less than 1% of the server population even goes?
I thought HC was all about leveling, but everybody that argues against TBC HC always references where the vast majority of the playerbase wont even venture.
No I’m talking about TBC and WOTLK HC, it was dead compared to era back in the addon days.
It was dead because TBC and WOTLK trivialize the 1-58 content.
What about TBC HC, but with a level 60 checkpoint? So if you die 60+ you “reset” to level 60 with the same items, spells, gear etc you had at 60.
So semi-hardcore. Sounds lame.
everyone died now so no need to go to TBC
2 Likes
Good point. Thanks Blizzard for not reinvesting a single penny back into your infrastructure (from the $100+ million we give them every month) to provide any ddos mitigation.
Hard core Teron Gorefiend and Azgalor. Do we change the mechanics or say that the death doesn’t count? What if the team wipes while you’re “dead?”
This is utter and sheer 
we were many, not only HC-addon users, but from the old IronMan crew as well playing HC all the way to Wrath. Sure many left - most of all many of those just following the FOTM and streamers. But most of these left at their first (or third) death, no matter in which xpac it happened 
And please … the HC addon did not even become really popular until just before TBC Classic launched 
No thanks, and BTW the time spent 1-60 in Classic and 1-70 in TBC is almost the same, maybe TBC is a bit faster
Nothing worse thanl a simple person thinking they are smart
The reason it wouldn’t work is because you wouldn’t have the world buff meta to abuse that lets you knock over vanilla bosses in a laughable amount of time.
Sorry, but Blizzard is actually right on this one.
End game contents are extra, the leveling is the real game. Leveling a Draenei or a Belf the HC way is fun. Let’s try on official HC servers this time around
Ya, just like Blizzard was right on vanilla hardcore.
Would TBC leveling be that fun though for HC? The reason I enjoy the challenge of vanilla HC is because your character is generally quite weak throughout the journey to 60 due to the more simplistic class design and limited gear upgrades available unless you get lucky with dungeon drops or have a higher level character to funnel yourself gear.
Meanwhile TBC class design and outland quest rewards pretty much let you steamroll to 70 with little concern for dying even if you regularly pull multiple mobs at once.
Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy TBC leveling, but I’ve never though of it as being challenging outside of a few dungeon fights.
Yes it would. I tried it in the Classic servers, it would be even more fun on an official HC server.
Well, maybe because I did it the IronMan way - no gear better than white, no Dungeons, no buffs - it was quite challenging.
Yeah all 20 of you