Harry Potter vs. Warcraft

Community General Discussion
1

Which is better?

2 Likes
2

Harry Potter hands down.

1 Like
3

Harry Potter has house elves. House elves are the worst elves.

Warcraft is better.

1 Like
4

Warcraft, in my eyes, is better.

Harry Potter lore is not so grand nor fleshed out, no matter how many retcons Warcraft receives minute-by-minute, it’s still more magnificent and imaginative than Harry Potter’s. It’s also, to a degree, more relateable. Harry Potter, every now and again, just has a tug of heart strings here and there.

4 Likes
5

Goats are much better than dead fish.

6

You are a gorgeous goat, yes you are~

1 Like
7

Is that how you got your post count?

8

Space goats all the way :heart:

1 Like
9

If there was a Harry Potter MMORPG I’d have left this garbage long ago

Aloe hammora

2 Likes
10

I tried trolling like some others do here, but I dont like vacations.
:face_with_raised_eyebrow:

11

Harry Potter has sissy magic, ugly House “Elves”, no demons or world-ending abominations from beyond, and the only race shown any prominence are Humans.

Warcraft has many villains, ranging from racist nutcases and organized crime syndicates, evil demon and eldritch worshipping cults, and greater universe-threatening monsters like Sargeras and the Void Lords. Harry Potter has a gaggle of dumbass racists lead by a bargain-bin Sociopathic inbred Wizard Hitler.

Yeah, Warcraft pretty much wins. Gul’dan was the closest to Voldemort in terms of character, and Gul’dan was still more interesting in personality, style, background, and goals compared to Voldemort.

3 Likes
12

Definitely Warcraft though, it’s lore and world is just too expansive by comparison.

13

Hm… I think Kil’jaeden kind of fits the role of Voldemort a little better, and Velen would be Dumbledore.

14

I would take a house elf pet though. One that I could slap around.

15

Warcraft. The entire Harry Potter series is about some kid who’s only special because the scourge of the wizarding world tried to use powerful dark magic to kill a baby he knew might be protected from it instead of doing literally anything else. Seriously, how do you screw up killing a baby?

3 Likes
16

Not really. Kil’jaeden was a genuinely well-meaning man who was willing to use the “ends justify the means” to save the universe from the Void, and he still felt large amounts of regret for what happened to Argus and his people. He just justified it by telling himself that it was “for the greater good”.

Archimonde was much closer to Voldemort, being a power-mongering sociopath who used everyone else around him, betrayed even “friends” who were no longer useful to him like Thal’kiel, and was willing to go to any lengths to become more powerful and dominate others. Which is similar to Voldemort in being a prideful and murderous sociopath.

2 Likes
17

Ah, my bad, you’re right. I didn’t mean Kil’jaeden. Dx He was just the one that came to mind for some reason. You’re right, you’re right~

1 Like
18

Harry Potter Lore makes no sense.

And it doesn’t matter how many retcons wow receives, at least it makes sense.

2 Likes
19

I honestly don’t think I could pick. I enjoy both a great deal but feel the worlds they happen in are so different. It’s kinda like saying I an orange is hands down better than corn.

20

When your ‘big-bad’ villain can’t even take over a damn High School, how can anyone take him or the whole story seriously.

4 Likes