What an absolute shame
, the 10th gen barely beats its predecessor but the ryzen 4800 and 4900 parts still kills the 10th gen.
But this kind of info will be looked the other way because “reasons”.
Makes me wonder if this is foreshadowing the desktop versions coming soon
Are you referring to the countless times people have spelled out why we don’t take you seriously or do you just flag their posts without reading them?
1 Like
There’s one! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9adc7/9adc7e686b521d2abef52a67da120999a126c939" alt=":smiley: :smiley:"
More like refusing to acknowledge because pro blue, especially during the 2017-2018 years
10th generation Intel desktop is what 9th gen “should” have been.
If we got the i5-10600k and i7-10700k back in 2018 instead of that embarrassment that is the i5-9600k and i7-9700k, it would not be such a clear cut choice to recommend the Ryzen 5 3600 or Ryzen 7 3700x.
Given we’re getting 10th generation only NOW (and by now, I mean soon, LOL), Intel will only have a few months at best to be able to actually “compete” with AMD until 4th generation launches at the end of the year.
Then its catch up all over again for Intel.