Yes? Action being allowing guild banks leading to changes being allowed.
1 Like
I dismiss most of the pro-changers simply because that most were “wall of no” supporters and classic server haters before blizzard announced classic servers this crowd are the Bill Kristol’s of WoW. If you dont know who Bill Kristol is let me explain, Bill Kristol is a quasi conservative columnist who in the past advocated for 99% of what Trump has done yet he and a few others started the #nevertrumper movement because they wanted to push another Bush or Bush accolate in to the white house for more military spending and foreign wars and not so soon after his publication “The Weekly Standard” went bankrupt he was also part of the cabal that lobbied for the 2nd Iraqi War.
Are we flagging every guild bank thread now? How petulant. I like the title change Farrah ![:smiley:](https://d38bqls1q93fod.cloudfront.net/en/wow/images/emoji/twitter/smiley.png?v=6" ":smiley:")
It feels pretty much like that lol.
2 Likes
Blizzard don’t say nothing to us so let watch this fight ![:man_shrugging:](https://d38bqls1q93fod.cloudfront.net/en/wow/images/emoji/twitter/man_shrugging.png?v=6" ":man_shrugging:")
![:popcorn:](https://d38bqls1q93fod.cloudfront.net/en/wow/images/emoji/twitter/popcorn.png?v=6" ":popcorn:")
Personally I see Blizzard being flooded with more tickets about classic then anything in retail. There are just too many areas they removed from retail that are going to rear its head again in Classic.
I support the OP’s post.
1 Like
Incorrect
These are things we asked for in 2005
They have flagged it twice now and blizzard will unflag it again soon I’m sure. Pro changers can’t handle facts being delivered to their face.
4 Likes
Sharding and loot sharing would like to have a word with you
And ftr: I don’t necessarily support these, but just making a point that DISCUSSION shouldn’t be squashed
1 Like
Another pro changer using sharding and loot trading as excuse to why adding guild banks isn’t bad. Just wait for tbc and stop trying to destroy Classic
5 Likes
I am well aware of the support classic had.
But blizzard did make it a point to mention that they were going to include graphical updates to support it. Which to me means there will be graphical updates to the world and npc’s
Looks like it was finally unflagged again. Pro changers really want this thread shut down because it refutes all their ’ arguments’ aka “WAAAAAAA!!! I want QoL features!!! WAAAAAAAA!!!” Padrepwn even made a new thread twice to try and necro this one. He used one of his alts to make part 16 and now he has ‘if they are added will you play’. Pathetic!
3 Likes
Hear that? It’s the point going way over your head
Its amazing what robots do isnt it?
Posts auto un flag if a moderator hasnt looked at them and i am guessing one hasnt looked at this forum for a couple of days
1 Like
Go play retail if you want QoL
3 Likes
Vanilla had its own QoL so saying it’s in retail is disingenuous
Vanilla’s ‘QoL’ was nothing close to retails. If you think it was, you are delusional.
1 Like
But you just admitted it had QoL
Yes i did, and it did have one thing that was a QoL feature. That was a chat channel called LFG that was added half way through and expanded upon in TBC then Wrath then again every expansion ruining the game more and more. Should have not been added to the game. It is the closest thing to a QoL feature, a chat channel. Nothing nearly as impactful as LFR or guild banks. FYI LFG going from a chat channel to what it is now over every expansion of them game is another example of slippery slope and thus a reason why guild banks should not be added, same with sharding and loot sharing.
2 Likes
Look out! Padrepwn is typing again. Probably going to twist facts to support his own agenda. Congrats on getting the CMs to unflag your post AGAIN. Players like padrepwn like to flag things when they know they lost the argument.
3 Likes