OK, fair. I have nothing further to add to this conversation.
As an aside, are these the same tribe as the ones in BfA? Are the ones in the STV town still friendly to Ally in BfA if so?
I think I want classic plus but I donāt (dead meme I know, donāt hurt me).
But seriously I agree itās a pipe dream for people that want it because in reality I donāt think the classic wow team has the resources (art team, animators, etc) to just make new content like retail does since theyāre completely separate from the retail team.
I honestly think TBC is farfetched as well but Iām glad to see people think theyāll go that route. Theyād make just as much money with far less work from doing TBC versus classic plus and thatās really the bottom line at the end of the day to any company.
Your comments are always spot on, and include WoW references. 10/10, everything, all 4 judges agree.
Is it gone? Itās there right now, in retail WoW. If you start a new goblin today, you play the goblin starter zones (up through the volcano and the mines) until level 14 or so.
There is no reason to put it in some other game, when it is there, now, in WoW.
Edit: I donāt think the players agree. I think we all mean something different when we say āclassic-plusā.
If the players all agreed, I think Classic-plus would be a pretty good game. A game I would enjoy.
IDK, it seems like they do with the Standard Game. Thatās why itās so abstract and weird.
The term now is āsimpsā.
YOUR DAD GAMER IS SHOWING.
Thatās THEIR ideas. I agree ā their ideas seem very abstract and weird to me.
Thatās why Iām eagerly looking forward to shadowlands ā not.
Iām not against the idea of classic+ at all. Activision/Blizz however is going to monetize WoW in the most efficient way possible. That is by releasing TBC and WotLK.
They would have to break form in a big way to do anything else. What players want isnāt their focus. What is the most cost effective thing players will pay for is.
Not particularly just their ideas. Iām sure member feedback played a role.