I don’t want to sound pessimistic, but do you remember the number of thread for a rework of the worgens since Draenor?
There was something like… 4 part back in the old limitation of posts per thread?
And how long we waited to have an answer? Too many years outside of the one stating that we were at the bottom of their priorities.
I’m sure that they are aware of this thread but i bet that we are at the bottom of their priorities list once again.
It would be a good start if at the Blizzcon, they stop to give us the silent treatment for once.
That doesn’t mean they didn’t see it. They 100% saw it. It just wasn’t a priority for them. Which may or may not be the case here. But either way it’s impossible for them not to notice. Which is why if something is popular enough I believe bliz should be obligated to respond. 100 likes or 1,000 comments.
Worgen also used to be pure white, wear wood and leather armor and have freddy krooger fingers in the game, which can only be considered the true cannon. “Lore” in WoW is as malleable as any werewolf lore. Which is to say, it changes with the telling and no version is really wrong, imo. After all, the current Worgen race is clearly the newest strain of an ever-evolving race. Can it really be considered lore breaking if, one day, their continued evolution bring them tails?
It would hardly be the most dramatic change they’ve seen in just the past decade…
I just find it funny that he also has a request for something he would like to see ingame playable Ethereals and he uses Heathstone art to show females exist. But when it comes to Worgen and our requests its 100% impossible in his mindset. Oh well we will see if he gets out of hand again and deal with him if he does.
Let’s also not forget that before Cataclysm, there really wasn’t a “female worgen”. By Lores arguments, there shouldn’t be any because it’s lore breaking and against the established lore for there to be Worgen with breast and over all a female appearance. It’s simply not possible because they never had it to begin with… Oh wait, but Blizzard changed that and gave em breast anyways even thought they didn’t before.
See how easy it is to just add things in without explanation?
I’m on the boat that wants them to add in tails in a lore friendly way thought, and I’ve stated how you can many times. Just copy and paste the tail they had in pact form and boom. Now we have a tail option! Doesn’t hurt the “lore” at all. Even thought honestly if you game em a tail, it wouldn’t really change anything at all with the story to begin with. Giving worgens a tail won’t cause a butterfly effect where now we fight Sargeras and suddenly he has a all mighty tail that he uses to smash the universe.
I was never banned, where’d you come up with that false narrative? Feel free to check my post history, I’ve been active in other threads almost every day. I’ve done nothing wrong to get banned in the first place.
They exist in WoW too, without the use of Hearthstone for evidence. I was simply mentioning sexual dimorphism which currently doesn’t. However, the difference is that unlike blizzard mentioning worgen do not have tails in WoW, blizzard has never said anything about ethereal sexual dimorphism. Even still, if you were to have read the thread, it was only a suggestion since many whine about races requiring sexual dimorphism. I’m perfectly fine if they left it the way it already is.
i just submitted a Q&A for blizzcon online referenced this post and said we are all wondering if we are getting tails and up right ears for more cusotmizations
Submit your question about a Worgen tail option here:
Protip: do not rant and do not overcomplicate your question with unnecessary details, reasonings, or justification. Keep it simple, keep it short, concise, and to the point… something that you know that they would actually bother to read and consider if they do choose to have a question about tails.
Respond to criticism of your own positions or just keep getting flagged as spam. If you want to disagree that is fine. You’ve said your piece many times, now step up and actually defend it. If you want to just stamp your feet and ignore the people who debunk you, piss off.
You literally just proved to everyone here that you’re abusing the report system to silence me even though I’m not breaking any rules. I’m not spamming, I’m not doing anything wrong. I have yet to be debunked. I’d prefer if the harassment towards me would stop as it’s against the CoC to target someone like what is happening right now. It doesn’t take much scrolling to see the true individuals spamming if that is what you would like to fixate on.
We used to be able to say “Blood elves don’t have dark skin”. Now they do and it’s great!
Worgens did not have tails but they could. Genn and anyone who doesn’t want it can stay the same. I would love to have it as an optional thing for more customization because Worgen need options badly.
Thanks! I submited my own about Worgen customization.
If you’re referring to the female ethereal thing, it was in response to one person making a false statement and someone else asking a question. And the fact that you’re claiming I’m “filling” it is a complete lie.
Haven’t been able to say that since the tabletop rpg was made non canon, or as of cata.
It’s only stated in that non-canon rpg tabletop that thalassian elves were pale skinned and as of cata Demi was a thing. She’s a dark skinned thalassian.
Everything else isn’t lore. It’s made up over years of people just assuming.
Hear hear.
Tails won’t change any lore so there’s no reason not to add em. (as an option)
Speaking of, can’t you go back to your ethereals thread and leave folk be?
referenced this post and said we are all wondering if we are getting tails and up right ears for more cusotmizations
