Oh, they mean something to you. Otherwise you wouldn’t have answered my post. You’re only fooling yourself friend.
Me responding to you means nothing more than me killing time while waiting for my shawarma. Don’t think yourself important because you’re getting an ounce of attention.
Blah blah blah… I do hope that made you feel superior. lmao
I’d usually be the first one to mock someone for tritely saying something along the lines of ‘projection much?’, but yours is undeniable.
We’re just gonna have to agree to disagree 
there’s nothing more to talk about until blizzard chimes in on the issue.
1 Like
Who cares report the gdkp scrubs haha
1 Like
Not a lot of that on the HC server I play, now that the locusts have moved to SOD. They’re all yours now BB.
1 Like
Tell the truth now …you know you’d be the very first. Every. Single. Time.
Hint: you already did.
Maaaaaaaaaaaan just give up already. You crapped out of the casino a long time ago when that CS said you were accusing people of touching children in trade/general chat.
This is the one.
I was questing in Ashenvale the other day and this hunter next to me seemed very new to the game so I inspected him. He had the epic BFD bow, couple random bfd blues and a lvl 25 grey cloak that had no stats but armor, bunch of lvl 13 greens, also no rune in his chest. I immediately came to the conclusion that he was a swiper.
2 Likes
I’m okay with that. At least this way they are out of sight like the parasites they are 
Agreed.
2 Likes
Look, its all the RMT kids like that mage who keep popping into these threads to add nothing of substance.
Oh look, green AND blue post?
Sit down lmao.
3 Likes
Or he got lucky in a MS/OS BFD raid and got a bunch of pieces. Lost 5 rolls to the same feral druid in 1 run before, to all 5 pieces of feral loot that dropped.
haha sure he did
1 Like
Dude, take your L, get off the site and go touch grass…
Your main character syndrome is flaring up.
“Occam’s razor (or Ockham’s razor) is a principle from philosophy . Suppose an event has two possible explanations. The explanation that requires the fewest assumptions is usually correct. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation”
1 Like
yes I am well aware of the theory.
Obviously he got into a BFD raid, that isn’t an assumption that is a fact.
You are assuming it was a GDKP, you are also assuming he swiped money for all the pieces (as opposed to having an main and that being his alt and thus having funding from the main to cover the alts expenses)
I am assuming he got lucky rolls in a M/OS run.
In short my theory actually requires less assumptions then yours. So Occam’s razor would point to my theory being the correct one.