Following Sylvanas was never about "following sylvanas"

It was about following opportunities she provide. Moral freedom.

You want to kidnap dwarf for experiments? Do it. Wanna produce new super lethal poison? You go girl. Wanna have blind human female slave or cages full of test subjects? Just buy a cage.

Being edgy for the sake of being edgy. Excuse to be just as evil as Sylvanas.

True Sylvanas loyalist know she’s using everyone including us, so just we use that freedom she gives us in return.

Victory for Sylvanas and death to the living.

3 Likes

Quoting Ogmot:

Ogmot sees lady wrapped in dark swirlies. She leads herd of blind sheep.

Da sheepies follow her everplace she go. Do everthin she say. Never doubt lady.

She guide dem over tall cliff! SPLAT SPLAT SPLAT! Stupid sheepies!

Da crows get fat eatin da sheepflesh. Da lady laugh as crows eat!

Crows eat as Sylvanas laughs of the moral freedom.

7 Likes

Noble Alliance + Noble Horde is not interesting to me.

SWTOR carries two factions of both extremes VERY well, fine, AND dandy.

I like being a Sylvanas loyalist, the air of Cersei-esque superiority energy that she brings, and that we in turn as loyalists also embody.

1 Like

moral freedom my runic sword!!! thats the excuse of a villain, join the scourge, the burning legion or the old gods if you think like that

Just because they are the villian of your story does not make them the villain as a whole. The scourge 1 mind with one focus to gather strength to protect azeroth. The burning legion. Wiping out lesser races that can be corrupted amd bring an end to all things. The void giving the option to all possibilities and not the 1 path pre ordained by the light, free will over fate. To them we are the villians its a matter of perspective

If you are being used, you aren’t really free.

2 Likes

What you call superiority, I call idiocy.
Baaaah.

Imagine trusting a prophecy of an ogre. A mad ogre at that. You know being mad usually implies you are crazy right?

So here we are having people trusting a prophecy from a race of people know for being exceedingly stupid. But not just that…but a crazy stupid person? That sounds like someone to listen to.

She killed and raised tauren outside the gates of Lordaeron. The female dog must die.

Those Tauren was already dead in the grand scheme of things. Not literally mind you figuratively. Had Sylvanas not acted the Alliance would have killed them anyways. Killing them along with the Alliance to raise them again actually saved the lives of the troops behind the plague wall.

And then left them dead, which to them is certainly preferable to being raised as an undead zombie.

Maybe, maybe not. The Alliance takes prisoners, as we seen with Saurfang.

Also, it’s one thing to die at the hands of your enemies while protecting your allies. It’s another to be murdered by your leader while you were protecting her house.

1 Like

They took Saurfang prisoner because he was an important character. I doubt random tauren #28 would have much significant use to the alliance.

Again, maybe maybe not. She took that decision out of everyone’s hands. But, we’re back to this:

Imagine thinking it was written by an actual ogre and not Blizzard.

Is there much difference?

Imagine it being right regardless.

This thread sounds surprisingly like a “joys of being cucked” thread.

Put another way: A slave who believes they are free is still a slave.

For the zombie pied piper! XD

1 Like

Cheeseburgers. #28 was sacrificed to feed a hungry army.

1 Like

I am not so sure about that. Freedom could easily be a state of mind and not a state of being. I think therefor I am.

If you feel free how are you not free?