Fix or Remove Spell Batching. Period


(Troodrood) #59

You mean like, when I shapeshift and I can’t do anything for a second or two without getting a “you’re in combat” error message, when i’m clearly not.


#60

I never once said this what is your problem?

Let’s try to stop spreading lies when you’re trying to make a point, it makes your side look just a tad bit better. It’s working as intended. Whether you like it or not I really don’t care, sometimes I hate it sometimes I like it. This is how it is suppose to work.


(Troodrood) #61

You would make up anything to support the devs’ bad decisions. Your opinion is your opinion. I am not the only one in this thread that disagrees with you.


#62

It works just like it should. Whats hilarious to me is all the evidence that has been provided has supported that spell batching is working as intended yet you still can’t seem to see it.


#63

What? I haven’t said anything that has defended spell batching as a decision. I’m simply explaining to you children that it is working as intended. Which it is


#64

They changed how it works and how often. Used the term “best fits” in regards to how batching FEELS.

“we did change how (and how often) we process batches”

How that is processed has changed.

It’s not the same batching system. It’s the modern batching system prioritized and tuned for Vanilla.

Again, nearly everything in this game has bugs. This is no different.

It needs to function like it did in Vanilla - full stop.

Right now it doesn’t.

Try again.


#65

Do you have Furor, by chance?


#66

They have the ability to tighten or shorten the window.

That is what should be done.


#67

They are referring to what they did in retail you absolute moron. They then explained that they brought it back to the vanilla state where it had no priorities and it didn’t loop as often


#68

Thanks for calling me a moron.

There absolutely is a priority. Blizz talked about it in the blue post I linked.

I just linked it. You didn’t read it - but I’m the moron.

Sure, Jan.


#69

And they mentioned they set those priorities to emulate vanilla. As in, making them seem like there is no priorities. Do you understand this?


#70

No. They said they moved spells from high priority to low priority - not “to make them seem like they had no priority”. That is 100% not what Blizz said.

Try again.

If you’re not going to argue in good faith, why are you here?


#71

mobs will still to this day get a single autoattack off on rogues and druids who 1-shot them from stealth.

The thing that made you hostile towards me was an ability that killed you instantly with a single hit, and yous till autoattacked me?


#72

Holy christ child

Do you need me to wipe your butt too?

This is what they said which means exactly what I said it means just with different words.


#73

Read what you wrote out loud. You said it was to make it seem like they had no priority, that is the antithesis of actually having a priority - which Blizz stated they had.

Your excuse is that you used different words which mean different things but to you they mean the same thing.

And you call me a child?

Project much?

I get it, you have no argument so now you are making stuff up and throwing out personal attacks.

That doesn’t phase me.


#74

Let me break this down for you.

Vanilla batching had no priorities. At the very least it had almost none. Right?

They said they are lowering priorities of spells to match 1.12

What do you think they basically said.

Put it together with your own thoughts.


#75

For all the talk of special interrupt code, it directly contradicts what the Blue post said.

Kevin has mentioned that he doesn’t do code. I won’t be surprised if he had gotten that wrong. Your video also doesn’t state when the special interrupt code was added so it’s possible that Kevin is 100% correct but the interrupt code was added in BC or later then removed once they got spell batching more responsive - i.e. responsive enough to match/surpass the special interrupt code.


#76

That’s not what they said at all. You can’t just make up what you THINK it means - what Blizz meant is what they wrote. Which is the antithesis of what you are CLAIMING they said by putting your own failed attempt to ram your own wrong point by twisting words to wiggle your way out of not reading what was linked.


#77

The video was taken out of context I believe. Because they DID change it to the priority list eventually.


#78

Not in Vanilla. After Vanilla, yes.