BM never stays OP for long, BM is oppressive when it does OP damage just like demon hunter due to its design and how easy it is to get a rotation off.
Will be nerfed quickly imo, hunter normally always get nerfed quickly when its OP because it is super oppressive, unlike casters you cant lock them down with interrupts, so either they get defensive nerfs quickly or damage nerfs quickly.
Every spec has counters to a degree. If youâre asking an honest question and arenât just looking to win an argument then for AWC and MM specifically I think itâs just that Sub Rogue is heavily played and it makes life very difficult for MM since they can disrupt so much of their damage. I actually think itâs a mistake to play BM into something like Feral/Frost Mage since the pets can be so heavily controlled.
Not gonna lie most of my damage in Arena as MM comes from Rapid Fire channel while on the move and instant cast Aimed shots and instant cast Kill Shots. Not sure why you think MM is so immobile.
Which Hunter are you referring too? BM Burst is basically non-existent. Itâs just good solid pressure over time. The ramp up to the consistent damage on BM is also annoying. Build 3 stacks of Barbed shot buffs, cast Black Arrow, Cast Beastial Wrath, cast Call of the Wild THEN finally when youâve pressed 6 globals all just to build up to damage you can finally start using Kill Commands.
If you look at the top rated 5000 players in pvp across all gamemodes MM is the third most represented spec and across 2.2k plus its 4th. I am talking about MM, some hunter is telling everybody hunter defensives suck and hunters suck which isnt true which is why i replied saying MM wasnt bad.
AgainâŚBM does OP damage? LOLâŚDude BM damage is NOTHING compared to S4 Dragonflight burst levels. Call of the Wild was tuned down massively between expacs.
Ah I see, yea MM Burst is pretty insane I can agree on that. And no MM is absolutely not bad at all. MM in Shuffles is extremely good.
I didnt say BM does OP damage, i said when BM does OP damage its too opressive due to its design and gets nerfed quickly. You need to read before going off on somebody lmao
I mained hunter for ages, BM being OP everybody cries hard and hates the game just like DH which is why they get nerfed quickly.
Alright yea I can agree with that as well. Thatâs why it was brought down between expacs since S4 BM was extremely damaging.
Blizzard basically dont know how to balance hunter, its a range dps with unlimited up time that has no draw backs of being a range dps (interrupts). Back in the day the draw back was deadzone but it doesnt have that anymore.
So it just in a weird spot forever now and whenever it does slightly OP damage blizz nerfs it.
IDK if BM is going to be able to LoH itself with tons of stacking damage reduction and be tankier than a warrior while 100-0âing me in 4 seconds from stealth at 60 yards.
LOL, Are we playing the game of âThings that never happendâ
Go play PvP.
Do people actually notice any difference? Class design is so stale the only difference is there is screen clutter with BM.
Both deal good consistent damage, you act no different than versus MM.
Man donât be a tease!
Was gonna say surv feels the same tankiness as the other two
J havent touched surv yet tho so im bias
Well youâre not really wrong. Survival is also too tanky, I only said ânot far offâ because when you have specs with the exact same tools but one pushes in to do max dmg while one stays back and does so, the one that pushes in is inherently a little easier to kill.
With that said Survival still also has too much, and Iâm really glad that blizz was much more heavy on the passive defensive hero talents because passives should always be hit first before actives imo.