While iconography IS important, this is waaay far from literally them Blizz devs saying: “this religion is based upon X irl religion”. Which never happened.
Just like in my example about lights in the night sky getting perceived as UFOs or funny spots in a rando wall becoming an image of a religious figure, none of these things end up being what people sees and asume they are. Simple as that. At the end you prove my point: they put on visual clues BUT never directly confirmed anything, ergo they always left the stuff open for both interpretation AND to be developed in whatever direction they wanted, not only one based upon the irl religion.
Well Baal, they evidenty didn´t follow upon it -not even in TBC-. The angels on the bible are… harsh. The TBC version of the Naaru is more about how people BELIEVES angels are based upon pop culture than an actual biblical knowledge (why do you think people were so weirded by Castiel et al the first time they appeared in Supernatural? Cause people had this concept that angels are goodie two shoes that are kind and nice. Unfortunately, this pop culture portrayal is NOT correct regarding the actual biblical ones, though).
I disagree, at the end this amounts to how people interprets the stuff. And the FACT is, these several different interpretations are at the most “closer” or “further away” from the actual portrayal the devs want to give their characters, no more and no less.
So yes, at the end WE are the party guilty in creating our own disappointment. Cause WE wanted to see something that maybe was a 180° to what the devs wanted to portray, period.
Benedikt´s point still stands. NOTHING in the Alliance narrative nor the meta narrative put the focus on how that “horror” is basically caused by acting in pretty evil ways, nope. Suddenly the same morals that love to condem Orcs, Trolls and Forsaken left the chat when Velves arrived.
Quoted for truth.