Ok, here’s what I find infuriating. I posted and you replied:
We is defined as " I and the rest of a group that includes me." What group am I referring to? Everyone who supports DS? No, I defined the group in my first sentence, “several of those supporting dual spec.” This is basic English and reading comprehension. Either you’re not very good at it or you’re deliberately trying to mislead.
This is another of your deliberate attempts to mislead. I posted:
I didn’t say the “only one” or even “the one.” One criterion means one of several. It’s basic English that you don’t seem to understand. There is no one reason to make any change. Majority rules alone isn’t enough to make a change. That it makes the game more fun for me isn’t enough to make a change. That’s what I mean when I say I look at each change individually. I weigh the good and the bad, how it affects me personally and how it affects other people with different play styles, and how it affects the game.
Every time I talk to you I have to wade through this bs. Usually I ignore it because reading comprehension isn’t given the priority today that it was given when I went to school. Many people aren’t very good at it. Educators have acknowledged that and have dumbed down the reading comprehension sections of tests like the SAT. The importance of it has even been downgraded in college admissions because too many people were doing poorly on it.