You simplistic reply proves my point. 
1 Like
It’s spelled “your”, Mr. Thinks-He’s-Smart-Because-He-Quotes-Mark-Twain. 
::I’m drinking and don’t care::
On you showing people you are just a troll.
Self own on you. Gratz I guess. GG
Trolls oft accuse others of trolling to hide their tracks. 
Incidentally, a fool will oft blame heavy drinking for his foolishness.
Sir, you have a problem.
Show where I made this claim, please.
At the very bottom…
Something I should also mention is this:
Maybe you should explain why calling someone “a sad excuse for a human” is conducive to a worthwhile discussion and not “trolling” or just outright being rude.
See, the thing is, throughout this and so many other threads I never stooped to doing this. I’ll call people liars, sure, but I’ve never gone so far as to call someone anything less than human.
And you wanna say I’m the troll? 
Come on now, watching you edit you posts is boring to me.
Good lord the edits. I’m laughing typing to them and you add more. Like an Edgar Allan Poe, keeps getting sadder
Are you done editing or am I allow to point an laugh yet?
2 Likes
There’s a 12-minute discrepancy between the time it takes you to read my posts and write a new one. So I doubt it’s boring you if it’s taking you that long to read it.
If you look in the upper-right corner, the post has been edited one time. 
EDIT: Not waiting another 12-15 minutes while you figure out how to write one or two sentences. Good night. 
I watched you edit this for 12 minutes. Best you had. You were should have been to bean arguing you point and not attacking me.
It is conducive to the responsive given. The nature was rude and I have no reason to to treat him or you politely at this time. Act polite with your response and you will be treated polite. Act rude and you will be the first to cry. :me an everyone else are laughing at you both not with you::
No you are smart enough to not lie … yet. We both haven’t “call someone anything less than human” either.
Nice troll bait though.
I will edit this: Close thread. Can you decipher the point of this thread at this point. Look up 10-20 -30 post and stay on topic. They are not arguing the topic, they are arguing the people who don’t agree.
Oh, I see, so you’re just a child, then.
Sad excuse for X is still X. An apple will be an apple no matter what you say or do. It is a very basic concept taught to preschoolers. You could learn from them.
1 Like
But I just made Apple Juice Gelatin. 
You can. At no point does the apple become not an apple. ie An apple doesn’t become a watermelon.
Well, you can burn it. Then it becomes carbon.
Watch:
Was an analogy of apples and people.
Your first instinct was to burn it. Tone it down Hitler.
What do you mean becomes carbon … not how that works. Two posts up you call me a child and you fail this hard on basic science.
Projection of these trolls is the gift that keeps on giving.
1 Like
But I like to think of people as grapefruits.
Incomplete combustion of any organic substance will leave behind a mass of impure carbons. This is often referred to as “soot” or “ash”.
https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Ash
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/soot
This is like the kid who didn’t read a book in front of class giving as essay on the book he/she didn’t read.
No. The carbon was always there.
Hmm, no links disproving what I said. Interesting. 
Ooh, it’s the semantics game, is it?
https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110810105009431
Didn’t take you long, did it?