I never said they did. My entire statement was on the fact that they did indeed have taunts so your rebuttle of “they dont need a taunt” comes across as you stating, “They dont need a taunt” because they have threat and thats enough, as if they didn’t have one. Since they do have a taunt how is what you said relevant to my point of them having a taunt.
Your statement just confused me, but I apologize. There is a ton of misinformation on this subject and I was getting annoyed. Thats my bad.