Dragonmaw lore

His past is ultimately irrelevant to the events of War of Thorns. He was under demonic influence during the war against the Draenei, the First War, and the Second War, so his judgement was 100% impaired and he wasn’t fully in control of himself.

He expresses extreme regret for his role in those conflicts, and even tries to discourage Garrosh from going down the path of a warmonger by telling him stories of what happened to him and those old veterans who fought in those wars. Sadly it doesn’t work, which is why he fights against Garrosh during Vol’jin’s rebellion.

2 Likes

So we are made to feel sorry for them.
You admit it then.
Great, baby steps, baby steps.

Militia are not Soldiers thats why we call them Militia and not Soldiers. Thats the funny thing about language, different words mean different things.

He can object all he wants but he still did it.
He still attacked the NEs, responsible for the river of wisps in ashenvale who did not all die of natural causes and he tried to kill Malfurion.
He is 100% guilty.

Tell me you haven’t played the Alliance in Legion without telling me you did not play Alliance in Legion.

No you are right, watching your Army commit Warcraft’s equivalent of Rape of Nanking as their general does.

He says to you that he will have them spared if they don’t fight the Horde.
Those are his exact words.
And in the quest you escort no one to safety, you ask your questions and then tell them to go. Which they do.

Where to? Who knows.

Lol no it isn’t? Ignore the past and you are doomed to repeat it.
But this explains the Horde and Saurfang pretty well. History constantly repeating itself.

1 Like

The War of Thorns is so bereft of logic, and lacking in additional narrative help from later story, that you almost need to view it in a meta context instead of an indictment of any of the characters involved.

7 Likes

Agreed. Saurfang getting roped along into orchestrating a war would be interesting, if not for the fact that the argument Sylvanas gives is nonsensical and Saurfang of all orcs should know better than anyone that war is bad if it isn’t justified by necessity.

6 Likes

I said ‘We were not made to feel sorry for Sylvanas in BFA’ and I also said later we weren’t made to feel sorry for Saurfang or Sylvanas. You know this. My words were plain enough.

They are when it comes to armed conflict. If you raise up a militia as far as war and conflict are concerned they are considered armed combatants, aka, soldiers and are thus fair game.

Of fighting a war, yes. Fighting a war is not a crime.

Literally did. Genn faced no repercussions from the Alliance leadership for his attack on the Horde. Absolutely none. He was not chastised by Anduin, he was instead treated as a valued advisor.

Japans war against China was not illegal. Sure, the League of Nations considered it to be illegal (as both China and Japan were members of the League of Nations and the League of Nations had a rule that members shall not declare war on each other) but that’s as far as the illegality went. The individual acts of Japanese commanders was illegal, aka, a war crime (such as what happened at Nanking), but a Japanese soldier who did not participate in Nanking, who objected strongly to it and abandoned Japan after the event would be treated very differently compared to an individual who ordered the act and participated in it.

Which is fine. If they take up arms, they are at that point considered combatants. That is the nature of war and conflict, in most fictional universes and in real life. If an enemy army were to attack your home and you picked up no weapon, you would be treated as a civilian. If you picked up a weapon and attempted to attack the enemy forces, you would be treated as an enemy combatant.

All of your objections can be pulled apart and explained quite easily, but at the end of the day here are the facts, bereft of your opinion.

  1. Saurfang planned the war after being convinced of the threat the Alliance posed. His plan was to capture and occupy Teldrassil, not burn it.
  2. Saurfang engaged enemy soldiers during the war, never once ordering the deaths of or engaged directly in the killing a non-combatant/civilian.
  3. Saurfang orders you, the player, to move into Lor’danel and get the civilians out of harms way where they will be questioned and then released.
  4. Saurfang objects to the Burning of Teldrassil, 100%. He did not plan for it, he did not fire a single catapult or order any of his forces to fire a single catapult. That is the act which starts his abandonment of the Horde.
  5. Saurfang abandoned the Horde after seeing Sylvanas unleash the blight on Horde soldiers defending the walls. That was the final straw for him. He was defeated and taken into custody when he could have fled with the other Horde leaders who were defending Lordaeron.
  6. He was imprisoned (and would have stayed there if not for Anduin) and upon his release he became the leader of a rebellion to take the Horde back from Sylvanas, a cause which he was ultimately successful in, although it cost him his life.

He was not a war criminal, he was not a monster. Anyone with a proper understanding of the lore should understand this.

2 Likes

What a beautiful and touching story. I didn’t know it before but now I really want them in DF, too. Thanks for sharing!

2 Likes

Don’t worry Sylvanas will return soon. And then we kill the Horde council and bath in alliance blood.

I know Alliance hates to admit their wrongdoings but boy you taking it to a whole new level. This is one of the reasons why I will never feel sory for killing their people. The sooner the entire wretched faction is torn down the faster the rest of Azeroth can be happy about finally being free of your influence.

1 Like

Yeah I don’t get that line from Smallioz.

Genn attacked the Horde unprovoked, lost an airship and most of its crew and he faced absolutely no repercussions for it from the Alliance. Not even a stern warning from Anduin. Instead he essentially got promoted to ‘King’s Advisor’ which is a role he held throughout the entirety of BFA.

4 Likes

He provided Sylvanas the pretext to push Saurfang into War.

If he was punished then Sylvanas would have not had a pretext and would have been forced by the Jailer’s allies to side with a Faction capable of declaring war on both Factions.

Zovaal and Denathrius were empowered by Alliance lust for vengeance. They exploited it continuously!

They took advantage of Varian’s lust for vengeance against the Horde in general to get Sylvanas to use ruthless tactics at Gilneas just as they took advantage of Genn’s lust for vengeance against the Forsaken to give Sylvanas a pretext for war that Saurfang would accept.

Denathrius wins because of the desire for vengeance driving Alliance Leaders to break treaties!

Arthas was a deliberate attempt to trigger vengeance while Varian and Genn were happy accidents resulting from Sargeras siccing the Horde on the Alliance during the First War.

Regardless Denathrius and his Nathrezim always gets what they want from the Vengeful.

Honestly only the Light nuking the Veterans from the Second War & Stormwind City for blowing up their Lightbound Orc Army base would stop the Nathrezim from being able to divide the Factions at this point though obviously it would be at the cost of turning both Factions against the Light itself.

Naturally this would be balanced out by the Void ripping apart Silvermoon City making itself a target as well.

To be fair, Horde having not answered for literally destroying nation number (lost count) I cant blame em.
Why did the Horde not give the Forsaken any repercussions (again)? Hell the start of the entire Horde vs Alliance conflict was from Thrall just shrugging his shoulders when the Alliance asked why he was allowing Sylvanas to torture people in Undercity.

Okay, but here’s the thing. In the context of the events of Legion, we have the Alliance and the Horde working together against the Legion. Genn is angry about Varian’s death, but he’s under orders to watch Sylvanas and only engage ‘if the situation calls for it’.

It didn’t call for it, as he attacked from behind cloud cover, completely unprovoked. Sylvanas actually wasn’t doing anything on those ships other than sailing them to a location in Stormheim. She wasn’t engaging in anything that could be considered an aggressive act which would have prompted that assault.

So Genn effectively triggered a war between the Alliance and the Horde at that moment by attacking the Warchief of the Horde without provocation. Then instead of getting punished for that (which if I were Anduin I absolutely would have) he just gets a promotion.

Maybe glance over that chapter of Forsaken lore again. Thrall locked down the Undercity with his Kor’kron when he became aware of the RAF’s shenanigans (you know, about three minutes after Varian did) and made it impossible for them to continue their work. Garrosh was even stricter; he kept the Undercity staffed with orcs and gutted the Forsaken’s bioweapons. Sylvanas was “in the doghouse” after Wrath.

Ironically it was good guy Vol’jin who permitted the Forsaken some (figurative) breathing room, and then of course their queen became leader of the Horde.

1 Like

Not going to lie, I did not know any of this.
That’s definitely pretty interesting and gives Horde a more solid case. However even now when faced with a new leadership the only Forsaken even mentioning that Gilneans should have their home back is Caliea…

Well, if we want to go into technicality, Volkhan attacked first in Ashran. The Broken shore as I understand it was the only location where we had a cease-fire, the Alliance and Horde were very much at war since WoD.

The Alliance does however have a history of retaliating at odd/wrong times. Take all of Zandilar in BfA…
Forget about Genn why is no one talking about Halford Wyrmbane?!
Wyrmbane is probably the MOST evil Alliance commander and hardly anyone knows his name or actions during the 4th war.

From SL onwards we are made to feel sorry and Sympathize for Sylvanas.
Thats why she has so many 1 on 1 cinematics and a book about her early childhood about her.
And then she is set on a path of redemption to clear her sins.

A soldier is professional military person.
Militia is just armed citizens in an event of an emergency.

Of watching his army burn a whole a country to the ground without doing anything to stop it.

Because he did nothing wrong.
At the time Alliance was under the impression that the Horde got Varian killed.
Secondly in Azsuna we learn about what Sylvanas plans to do (maybe)
And thirdly Genn is a king not some lowly foot soldier. Andiun can’t do jack.

Saurfang was not a foot soldier. He was the general of the army and by your definiton he is guilty.

Regardless he led an army as their general.

Astranaar was wiped out by poison civilians and soldiers both from the Alliance perspective and Saurfang is praising the good work by the rogues in the novella.

He is the general and could have commanded them to stop.
And if Sylvanas refused he could have challenged her leadership.
He did nothing besides join her in Lordaeron and defend her.

Saurfang doesnt flee, the guy wants to die in battle. Win or lose this guy wants to go out fighting.

He is.
As demonstrated.

I agree thats why your attempts to paint him as a lowly foot soldier with no control over anything is innacurate and self serving for Saurfang.
The guy by all accounts is a monster that deserved a hanging.

No, we were not. I really don’t know where you concocted this fantasy, but it doesn’t match up with the reality. No attempt is made prior to 9.2 to show Sylvanas in a sympathetic light. The only attempt made to show Sylvanas in any light that could be considered sympathetic is when Uther is telling us about her soul and showing that the part of her soul that was spit is now being tormented, and that torment prevents her from waking.

But very quickly we’re shown that not only do the other leaders not care about that, but even Sylvanas knows that she is beyond sympathy, beyond forgiveness, and she’s spot on the money. Her crimes cannot be forgiven, she knows this.

Both are armed combatants as far as the rules of war are concerned. End of story. A militia member who picks up a weapon is treated no different than a professionally trained soldier.

Again, fighting a war is not a crime. Up until the burning of Teldrassil, that’s all the War of Thorns was. A war. Remember that as far as Saurfang knew the goal was to occupy Teldrassil and hold the people there hostage, ensuring that the Alliance would listen to the Horde’s demands. Sylvanas however had no plans to capture the Night Elven people. She was planning on burning the tree from the start, but she kept Saurfang in the dark.

Sorry, but he directly disobeyed orders from Anduin. He was given permission to engage ‘only’ if the situation called for it. But if you pay attention to what Genn is saying and the meaning behind those words, he makes it clear that he’s going to engage Sylvanas directly regardless.

So he disobeyed orders, willfully. Attacked the Warchief of the Horde completely unprovoked, lost one of the Alliance’s few remaining airships and killed the majority of the crew. If Genn didn’t have plot armor, that would have resulted in a military tribunal followed by imprisonment or execution.

Nope, because again Saurfang did not plan for what happened, at all. He did not plan for it, he did not authorize it, he objected strongly towards it being carried out. It’s that simple.

And all he did was wage a war. Waging a war is not a war crime.

Nope, that never happens. You’re misremembering events.

When Astranaar is attacked initially it’s Lorash Sunbeam, under orders from Sylvanas to clear the town, and you can choose if you want to, to kill the civilians in the town. But importantly killing the civilians earns you no credit towards your objective, heavily implying that the Horde gain nothing from their deaths. In the official novel it’s Lorash that commits these acts alone.

After the attack, Malfurion and the Night Elves engage Saurfang’s forces elsewhere and after being defeated retreat back to the city and set a trap for Saurfang. They arrange the corpses of fallen soldiers to make it look like the entire town has been wiped out by the Rogues, which is what Saurfang then praises, because there are no ‘night elves left alive’ when he got there (he could only see the corpses of soldiers, propped up by Malfurion and his army). Only it was, as stated, a trap and the trap was sprung, almost killing Saurfang. It was only due to Sylvanas intervening in the battle that Saurfang was not killed by Malfurion.

Nope, because he was outranked by the Warchief, who was literally right there.

And had he challenged mak’gora, he would have been executed, right there on the spot. Nathanos would have seen to his death personally. Mak’gora does not have to be accepted. It can mean dishonor, and so an Orc, who values honor highly, would accept, but Sylvanas, who doesn’t give a toss about honor, wouldn’t have to. The only reason she accepts Saurfang’s challenge outside Orgrimmar is because, as Saurfang states: “She wants to see him suffer.”. She doesn’t give a single piss about Orcish honor and customs.

I never said flee. I said he ‘abandoned the Horde’ which he did. He tried to go out in a blaze of glory, but was captured and then made it clear in his jail cell that the Horde Sylvanas was leading was not the Horde he knew or accepted.

Honestly all you’ve done is proven one of the key points that I made way back at the start of this thread. That you only see what you want to see, twisting what is presented until it fits the narrative you’ve formed inside your own head. Which is ‘Alliance good, Horde bad, Saurfang is a war criminal and Genn did nothing wrong’.

Which is so far off the mark it would be laughable if it wasn’t so sad.

The reality is far more nuanced.

7 Likes

Just because a character says don’t care about me doesn’t mean the audience wont :rofl:
They made multiple cinematics, books and novella to see Sylvanas’s childhood, her point of view and her tragic past.
Regardless of if she is stoic and doesn’t want redemption she is still made to be sympathetic towards the audience.
Otherwise we would have gotten books and cinematics on other characters.

But we didn’t. We got them for Sylvanas.

Words matter, you were calling them soldiers, now if you want to move the goal post of calling them armed combatants then go for it but lets be clear for a third time.
Soldiers =/= Militia

Again for what seems the hundreth time I am repeating this to you but it does not enter your brain Saurfangs ignorance and inaction at Teldrassil condemns him.
He has a history of mass killing civilians, he did nothing to stop the massacre and enabled Sylvanas every step of the way.
He brought the super power intercontinental fusion reactor catapults and parked them right on the shore.
He knew what they could be used for.

Ignorance is no defense. Innaction is no defense. And standing with Sylvanas at Lordaeron sure as siht isn’t a defense neither.
The guy is guilty. And since you are such a fan of taking character speech instead of using the grey matter between your ears he admits he is no innocent either.

He is a king.
He can disobey who he wants.
Andiun cant do jack.

And he judged it necessary. Again he can do what he wants. If you are upset Andiun’s explicit commands were not followed you will have a bad time. You are better off finding a new line of argumentation.

Lmao yeah sure.

He is the general of the army. The high effing overlord.
He could have made any attempt he wanted to put a stop to it.
He is not some helpless footsoldier.

If he led the army there
He could lead the army to stop the massacre. He did not.
Guilty.

Which on the Alliance side is canonically what happens since Alliance arrives afterwards and sees all the dead.

And so the canonical massacre that Saurfang praises. The city is wiped out and the NEs use it as an ambush location.
One action does not out do other.

And he could have challenged that order.
Just because someone outranks you does not mean you lose all autonomy when faced with immoral orders.

He could have ordered the Orcs and soldiers loyal to him to stop the massacre or lead a rescue effort or challenge Sylvanas directly. Even if she fights without honor he could have died with honor that he so desperately wants.
He is fully responsible period.
He let it happen, made no effort to stop it and he still showed up to defend her anyway at lordaeron.

The guy is guilty.

Pretty sure fled and flee are the same word.

I am not the one comparing High Overlord Saurfang to a helpless footsoldier devoid of any responsibility for massacre he
A) enabled.
B) stood-by and watch happen.
C) Defend the one that ordered it.
D) Has a history of multiple massacres just like this one.

You can excuse it all you want but facts don’t change.
The level of cognitive dissonance for some players here to excuse and put the villains on a pedestal here is incredible.

They made Kael’thas sympathetic in Shadowlands. That guy was previously a villian. They gave a book to Illidan and made him a hero in Legion. This seems like something Blizzard likes to do to their pet characters.

3 Likes

Kaelthas, Illidan, Sylvanas.

Its all the villains :sweat_smile:

Teldrassil had it coming. My only regret is that we didn’t get the chance to burn more then just one city. Ironforge and Stormwind are next. The alliance will fall. This I vow.