while thinking you were owed exclusivity to it. If someone wants to spend thousands, good on them, but when they get mad that others are getting it, that is a whole different level.
Making posts on forums and giving your opinion isnât meaningless at all.
But perhaps taking both the blue and the red pill wasnât the best idea, since - again - the vast majority is aware of the fact that they might posses things, but not own them, and Blizzard arbitrarily can do what ever they want should they wish so.
And of course this wasnât point of this discussion either.
So what channel(s) will count toward these? I donât want to waste 4 hours and not get credit.
People are not mad about others getting it, that they have it easier or for free, while they had to spend money on it.
People are mad because a BIG portion of that mount is devalued - and they fear this to happen to other goods in the same manner.
There is NO value. Thatâs the thing, here. Itâs perceived value. Nobody CARES you have a mount, except YOU. Nobody is going to pay you for seeing your mount. Nobody is going to join your raid or group because of your mount.
These is no value to having a mount OTHER than in-game transportation.
Except of course that âonly me caring for something of perceived valueâ is shared by billions of people around the world for innumerable various things.
Hmm? It certainly can have value. An unused magic rooster egg is far from worthless right now.
I used to have buyers approach me just because of my mount.
No they are mad because they spent $1000+ on the mount and now the âvalueâ they spent is gone. That is exactly what they are mad about and have said as much.
Anyone upset about this is purely childish and spent money on things purely because they wanted them. They recieved no promise that their pixels wouldnât come out again, and in fact they have been able to get them outside of TCG for years now, as I have stated before again and again
the BMAH has sold TCG mounts for years now
so no, it is nothing to do about anything but them being butt hurt.
Sure you did
Everyone is going on about the mount and Iâm sitting here thinking about the petâŚ
Having to pay a third party to get the pet is complete tauren feces.
âby gifting an eligible creatorâs channel two Twitch subscriptionsâ
What is the deciding criteria for being eligible? Why are only certain ones chosen to be paid by blizz? Why is my channel not eligible?
Why is blizz having the customer base pay someone else to get the pet? isnât that third party RMT? Player pays not blizz for something in game? Sounds like the same kind of RMT they liked to ban for.
Sinful was insane. Everybody and their mom wanted help in PvP.
There were also limited people who did CMs back in the day.
Another clueless person.
Streamers are NOT being paid by Blizzard.
It would be subbing to somebody that is streaming WoW and has drops enabled. Itâs not rocket science. Instead of charging money directly for a pet, theyâre opting to support streamers.
Buying Hero of Fate is an interesting choice, though.
To get the pet you need to gift two subs.
That is the requirement set by blizz.
They are requiring people to pay streamers if they want the pet.
That is being paid by blizz.
Fill me in, champ. Whatâs the streamer requirements for getting drops?
Oh wait, they havenât released that yet. So now weâre assuming that Blizzard isnât going to be fair about the drops system - since that info hasnât been made public yet - but people are already crying about that as well.
Thatâs a incorrect generalization - in all the forum threads in DE, FR, ESP and UK Iâve read regarding this topic, the vast majority (if) disagrees with this decision because there is a huge disconnect, especially regarding value and prestige of the mount.
Of course there are people who claim to have spend x amount of money to get it, but theyâre a minority not even worth to bring up in that argument.
Not the vast majority.
The loud, obnoxious, pathetic minority.
People that are happy with it arenât on here crying like you.
The vast majority of WoW doesnât use the forums champ. What you are doing is called anecdotal evidence. There is a reason it isnât a good argument. If everyone I know says the sky is purple, a majority of the people anecdotally in my life say the sky is purple. That doesnât mean a majority of people think the sky is purple factually.
If by that you mean giving an opinion, substantiated with objective and subjective arguments, then youâre absolutely right.
And Iâm afraid youâre just as âobnoxiousâ and âpatheticâ in that case - but unfortunately a lot less thorough.
I literally connected that with the forums, not the majority of wow players.
Please, stop twisting peoples words around.