Don't kill off the dragons, Blizzard

And? Grandblade is not lore. So Grandblade said he would post it.

I’m saying now that the two times you’ve lied about Lore to justify leaping to the defense of Grindable will be acknowledged by you and will apologize. I’m not going to pretend like that’s you committing to being a better person.

yeah this post proves to me you did not read the complete thread.

Then POST the part that shows that he refused to post it, or said he would post a link.

I’ll come back in two hours and point out that you haven’t, even though you never said you will.

Edit: Actually scratch that, I’ve got to get ready for work and I’ve got overtime. It’ll be sometime between 19 and 20 hours.

Okay. At this point it is obvious you got proven wrong with actual quotes from this thread so now you are just trolling. Grandblade called Lore’s bluff and well, we can see the results of it.

So posting proof of his broken promise is lying now? LOL

I have. Are you really this blind?

He said he would provide a source. Grandblade asked him to post the interview (basically provide a link). Lore only described the interview many posts later and didn’t provide a link to it. And many days later we still haven’t gotten the interview from Lore. Someone else had to do it.

So I’ll ask a third time. Why are you defending Lore when he refused to something that was asked of him?

Interesting. So I guess this was a lie now considering you are replying to my recent post

Yeah, turns out getting drawn into arguments with toxic liars is my kryptonite. Now I’m going to have to rush my shower.

No you didn’t. You posted him offering to find a source. And then some bull about how what he did do did not meet your utterly irrelevant standards. You didn’t post him refusing to provide a source that would look like a quote where he said the actual thing that refused to provide a source.

Which is why your claims have become lies.

This however I have already answered. Which is nice because I can show you how to prove a point.

My very first response to you answered this question. You’re only making yourself look ignorant by refusing to see it.

Anyway, back in 19 hours or so to ask why you didn’t do that thing someone else said you were going to do.

I have stated this theory before, and I still stand by it.
Think of each Dragon Aspect like a well. Every dragon born of their brood is like a bucket of specialized water from that well. Deathwing was a tainted well that threatened to cause a lot of death, damage, and suffering. The other Aspects spent all of their energy (or water) to purge Deathwing’s existence.
The wells of all the other Aspects, have run dry, the dragons are just buckets that contain said energy/water, no remaining energy (water), no new Dragons (buckets).
Whether you agree, or not, is up to you.

To me this makes the most logical sense, that is why I stand by it. As for reversing it, well Blizzard can take any route they want when you think about it. After all, didn’t we just bring Ysera back to life again?

Finding a source and providing one are two different things. He said he will gladly provide the source. Did you even read the post I linked earlier? The only one who is lying is you.

Again, Lore said he will PROVIDE one. Not find one. And even then he didn’t.

If you are referring to Baal, I am waiting for the WQ Limbo to give me the Lich Scenario again. It is completely random which set you get. So I have an actual reason why it is being delayed. What reason did Lore have for not providing a source when asked to do so? Nothing.

Still have no idea why you are defending him. Surely the man can speak for himself. He doesn’t need some SJW coming to his defense.

HAD yet to see where you failed save for missing a comment in this thread.

It wasn’t the word “yet” that was throwing you, it was the conjugation for the simple word Have.

You had meant to say you hadn’t seen it at that point, but have seen it now. Past tense.

By using the word HAVE, present tense, you were claiming you still hadn’t seen it at all, with the evidence staring you straight in the face, conveying both the opposite meaning, and then leaving you to insult me for reading what you had written, and not what you wanted to convey.

Weird thing to dredge up in the middle of the day, I was thinking about Denona’s weird denials of basic reality to try to maintain her position that Lore is a dirty oath breaker for not double posting the exact same video.

1 Like

In your opinion.

But in simple fact, Grandblade demanding he post a link be never be considered Lore promising to post a link. And since that post is still up as your only evidence that Lore promised to post a link. I don’t care.

Do you feel like you engage in that sort of behavior at all?

4 Likes

Ah the classic, “I don’t care if the facts are against me, I will just label it as fake news. Therefore I win”

Also what happened to be gone for 19-20 hours? Funny how you accused me of being the lair when you lie non-stop. Talk about gaslighting.

You do know that there was almost a whole day between when Lore said he would provide a source and when someone else actually provided it.

You wouldn’t know that because the forums doesn’t timecode how many days and hours a post was posted if the time was greater than 24 hours. But considering that there were several posts from different people maintaining a time listing, that shows that Lore basically refused to do what was asked of him. Which was why I asked if you actually read the thread fully and not cherry picked posts.

Since Lore clearly can’t defend himself and he needs some wannabe Simp to do it for him. Why did he wait for so long and still failed to deliver? Why hide like a coward hoping someone else would do his job for him?

hmmmm, makes me think that the only thing in common here is you. Maybe you are the actual toxic liar. I mean you did say you were gonna be off for 19-20 hours then a few minutes later you were back to posting like no tomorrow. And again about an hour later.

1 Like

Dragons can stop having babies now and still be around long after your great grand children have died of old age. They are practically immortal you know.

The obverse is true as well. There’s a Forgotten Realms story about a dragon putting it’s egg in the care of a human family. It’s 4 generations later and they’re still waiting for it to hatch.

Not at all. Your opinion is not a fact. Your opinion is not relevant. I don’t care when you tell me “that’s not good enough” because you don’t matter.

And? How long would it take you to find an undated interview without dragons even in the title. Trick question, you couldn’t. And Lore has a job and responsibilities, it would be even harder for him to find the time.

Yeah, that attempt at wit failed. For “the only thing in common here” to work, you’d need to be quoting something that mentions multiple situations. Or you’d need to mention them yourself. You did neither.

I do like how the only person who liked your comment got so embarrassed they immediately deleted their account.

Sure, it doesn’t really matter HOW they do it. The title of this thread is “Don’t kill off the dragons, Blizzard.” The OP wasn’t asking for various forum posters to try to justify why there could still be dragons. The OP was asking Blizzard to not remove dragons from the game.

Now maybe the OP felt comforted by Grandblade’s lore-optional claim about dragon egg population numbers, because population demographics are WoW’s strong point.

Maybe the OP felt more comforted by Zerde’s more useful, but still entirely hypothetical, metagame analysis of the iconic nature of dragons and how that guarantees their continued presence.

But the answer to the question “Don’t kill off the dragons, Blizzard.” came from Lore. Even if 1/3rd of what he said was incorrect, he pointed the questioner to a source from Blizzard talking about this issue that answered the OP’s question.

Lore, MVP of this thread, despite the crap he got.

I’m trying to be better about it. The only time I’ve said anything mean about Grandblade was when he prompted me to describe my biggest complaint of him. Past that I’ve been trying to keep it professional. And I haven’t once told Denona what I think about her, even though she hasn’t levelled an honest response in our entire interaction.

But it’s a process.

Thank you for calling my attention back to that.

Denona, you’re off the hook tomorrow. Which is said, I was going to tell you that Grandblade had instructed you to mail me a string of pork/turkey breakfast sausage, and since your posts equate instructions from Grandblade to promises from the instructed, you had to do it.

When you called me out for making that whole thing up. I was going to requote his instruction to “post the link.” A double pun! That only I would have probably laughed at.

I instructed Denona to do nothing, but it’s cute that your ego made you think this was some coordinated assault against you, and not just people reacting to you.

1 Like

Except I’m not the one who said, “I’ll gladly provide a source” then refuse to do so. It is cute seeing you come up with excuses for him. As I said, surely he can defend himself without needing to hide behind a wannabe simp.

:roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes: :roll_eyes:

Now we are getting conspiracy theories lol. How cute.

So I guess your definition of honest is different from mine (and the dictionaries) then. Rich coming from a gaslighter like yourself.

You do know that you said, “arguments” right? Arguments being plural. Meaning more than one. You are not very good at this are you? You are not as smart as you think you are.

inb4 you say that this is fake news or some BS. You will probably say, “well that is YOUR definition of plural. So it doesn’t count”.

1 Like

Okay, I’m going to take one last shot at explaining this to you. Even though you’re a toxic person who again has not levelled a single honest response this entire interaction.

You have a standard for what it means to provide a source. We’ll call this the Denona Standard.

Lore and Grandblade entered into a casual agreement that would require Lore to provide a source.

The Denona standard doesn’t apply to that agreement.

Currently the Lore standard does. It’s whatever Lore meant when he said he would supply a source.

If Lore had posted in agreement to Grandblade’s request for a link, then it would be an ad hoc standard agreed to by both parties. Neither of whom is Denona.

When I tell you that your opinion doesn’t matter here, it’s not an insult, it’s a literal statement of fact. You have no standing in this agreement.

And even if you did. It’s still a stupid argument to dredge up 8 days later. Even if you can prove that Lore did agree to post a link, and then couldn’t find that link as fast as someone else on the forum. All you’ve proven is that it takes Lore over a day to find a link.

Actually, that was going to be a… you know what, it’s explained in the post you didn’t understand. Try reading it again.

It is adorable that within an hour of each other you both posted the same denial to the same joke that you both misunderstood in the same way. If you’re not coordinating you should, you two would make a cute couple.

Edit: Actually strike that. From the heart man. I’ve been with the same great girl for over 10 years and I’ve learned that you want a wife that’s going to make you elevate yourself. Not one that’s going to feed your worst instincts. Denona is a bad match for you.

Anyway, glad this means you came back and caught the grammatical mistake you made earlier that explained a misunderstanding.

Now, as I close this interaction with you I’m going to briefly catalogue some of the lies and insult you’ve uttered.

Super classy this one since it’s someone who isn’t even here.

Well, that’s all I have the stomach for. You are a deeply unpleasant individual, like Grandblade, but if Grandblade lacked the self awareness necessary to realize this was a loser of an argument a mere hour after he dredged it up again 8 days later.

Good bye for now Denona. Next time we interact it will be much briefer than this.

Edit: Good news Denona, the same unknown/deleted user from before liked your post. I think someone has a secret admirer!

Coming from the guy who lied about being gone for almost a whole day then continued to post like no tomorrow during that time period.

Ah yes the classic, “I was only joking” defense. Only losers use that excuse.

You have said something like this before, so clearly you can. Not my fault that you are desperate to get into Lores’ nether regions that you have to Simp for him in a thread where he is in the wrong. Grandblade and I weren’t the only ones waiting for him to provide his source. If you had read the thread fully you would’ve known that. But I guess those people don’t matter to you then.

Also I noticed how you didn’t try to counter the whole “you said arguments, meaning plural” part. Like I said, you are not very good at this when the facts are against you. Sorry that you lost in such an amazing way. Shame that you are chickening out like this.

Calling you out on your lies makes me a lair? yeah you are trolling at this point, and not a very good one. I mean you tried to claim that saying “arguments” is singular.

just throwing this out there but, just because you asked for a source, doesn’t mean anyone owes you anything. You have Google at your fingertips if you were that curious to know you could have done your own research instead of making it a power move against Lore to have to constantly defend his own stances.