Ok, here it is:
Really? I’m not assuming anything. You are just trying to justify something that can’t be justified. They specifically say “we’re working on deploying some additional controls to further restrain layering from being exploitable.
They didn’t say they are deploying controls to restrain layering from being exploited, but instead say they will be deploying additional controls to further restrain it from being exploited. Notice the word further there. That word wouldn’t have been written if an exploit never existed to begin with and they wouldn’t be deploying additional controls if none were needed and exploits weren’t happening, now would they?