ahhh gaslighting while trying to explain gaslighting.
love to prove everyone correct dont you?
2 Likes
Hey Mr. brick wall im gonna show it to you a 7th time:
You are gaslighting me by trying to falsely make me look like a gaslighter.
Stop gaslighting me you gaslighter.
4 Likes
Hey mr repeats himself.
Whether its up to the server does not remove the fact that choosing to NOT take advantage of that RNG is a CHOICE.
If the server does delay and you donât have the âtechâ to accompish the task that is a choice.
Thank you thank you. bow
1 Like
take advantage of the healer being on GCD after pressing link which IS NOT RNG by CCing him on his trinket instead of relying on a low chance BUG.
Is that enough of an explanation you gaslighter?
You are right.
Itâs logical to not take a chance at completely negating spirit link. Itâs RNG. Itâs up to the server first. Sometimes the server gives you a window to completely negate link.
But its smart to just let link tick and choose to CC the healer.
Itâs smart to not even try to completely negate link.
Logical.
Im so silly
Wizk is taking the chance tho
Why do you think sterge and pika also need to?
You are right. Itâs logical to not increase the chances to completely negate link.
My mistake
Why would you increase your chances of negating a massive cooldown.
MY BAD
It is logical because there is a risk to reward ratio made with this decision. If the bug fails to occur, and you use a global killing link, the rsham gets a huge mastery boosted 150k riptide OR gets ascendance off or ns off or healing tide off and then u fail a kill window or a window to get even MORE cooldowns.
If you succesfully cc the healer on his trinket Same global you could INSTANTLY win the game off that.
Is that enough logic for you? gaslighter?
Thatâs kind of my point, though. Wizk took that chance and it was the wrong move. He took the chance and succeeded in a 1 in a 1000 play and it was the WRONG decision because he killed the totem instead of sam.
The consistent, more reliable play, and the one with fewer distractions is to focus on the situation at hand. Wizk was more worried about a weakaura than an hp bar.
In fact, swole showed a situation where he did the opposite of that in another game against curn, clap, and envyion and wizk went for the kill instead of killing the link and secured the kill. The WA was, for all intents and purposes, totally useless in that scenario.
2 Likes
Back to the tantrum I see
Because it could be a net negative 99% of the time
As has been stated
By multiple people
Multiple times
Yeah but it affected later games. They stopped dropping link unless he was in CC or LoS.
And you canât 100% know he woulda killed sam there either even if I donât disagree we canât 100% know what other actions would have accomplished.
The vod I linked did not show that. Thatâs more gas lighting.
Now he doesnât wanna talk in absolutes
What a wild ride this thread has been
I did link a vod where wiz insta killed the link after Sam died in the second to last round. In the same exact fashion as the first link kill. Except that time he didnât even need to do it, which is even more sketchy because this suggests the script went off on its own.
Your psych 101 book tell you that?
do you not use a global killing link in general? Yes if you have CC for healer instead of killing link and letting partner kill link that can be smart. But itâs situational. There will 100% be situations where choosing to kill link or a chance to kill link is the right move. But there will be situations where CC healer is the correct move. That is the nature of the game and what makes it hard and fun.
But choosing to NOT have the option to completely negate link is a choice that doesnât make sense to me.
Choosing not to use it and having the âtechâ makes sense. but âhaving no idea how wiz did thatâ doesnât make sense.
but the 1% of the time would be worth it. and potentially win you the game. These are pro players. Even if they have the âtechâ but dont use it. They can choose which is the correct course of action.
But choosing to not even have the option to completely negate it and versus having that tech and deciding to make that choice, right or wrong. I would choose to have the option rather than not have it at all.
and theres a 50% chance it griefs your UI and blocks you from seeing other things!
Ccing healer on LINK is ALWAYS the correct move.
Which is why they choose to play efficiently rather than having a random WA cluttering their screen for a <1% chance of it mattering ever
Every time you make this point you reach further and further
Yes probably did.
2 Likes