Call me a professional
asked and answered. stop trolling; this has nothing to do with the thread topic.
1 Like
And Aussies tend to exclusively consume and believe the worst of commentary and “news” of rhe U.S. One of us is at the core of a global order under which human rights have spread at unprecedented pace while major wars in Europe and Asia have plummeted. The other wants to do away with all of that. Pick your side.
Don’t have to pick a side we good here. No mass shootings, no identity culture crises, no setting womens rights back a few hundred years, we doing fine down here. Might be the reason we have seen immigration from the U.S. to here increase by over 70% in the last 3 years. That and we still paying only $1.98 for fuel.
So you pick the existing order. Thought so.
I gave a very clear definition. It’s not my fault if you don’t understand something so simple and clear.
A woman is someone who has a feminine gender identity and identified as such.
I asked but a simple question thats all.
A not very convincing definition.
You might not like it, it might be too hard for you to understand, but that’s the definition.
1 Like
Apparently the protesters didn’t get the messaged.
it worked fine for me. sometimes when i don’t understand something i read it more slowly and look up any big words i don’t know. i didn’t have to in this case but it’s a useful tactic, especially for learning new material or retaining things (e.g. when studying)
The existing Aussie order yeah, yeah I do. It’s miles ahead of the two options you’re listing.
It’s not miles ahead of either. It’s part of the established order.
Look, you can dur hur about and cast stones at America, but every country has scabs, scars, and warts. If you believe that’s all there is to America, that you can reduce it to a basket of typically misrepresented things like “mass shootings” (the closest the overwhelming majority of Americans or anyone they know will ever be to any kind of shooting is watching it on the news) or the overturning of Roe (ignoring the complexity of both the why and the paths forward) - that’s on you, your ignorance, and your bigotry.
Not to mention the use of chemical and nuclear warfare, bombing of hospitals and schools, an ever increasing statistic of unemployment and poverty due to a poor infastructial system, the use of outdated 2 party systems and the identity crises just to cover a few of the things you missed. You’re right about every country having it’s past flaws the diff is we learned and changed from them. Also yes you are miles behind and this from someone who has had the privilege of working in 17 different countries and experiencing them America ranks the 2nd worst experience after Belgium.
thats not defined well enough for me try again… and call me trans a phobe again and ill report you so fast im a ally of them folks
There can never be law that out right bans on an action in another state. In the US jurisdiction is limited to the place were the act happened. So if you live in MN and travel to CA to smoke some herbs you can be charged under CA law but MN can never charge you for it.
The only exception as you mentioned is the idea of conspiracy. So if you lived in MN and conspire to have an A in one of the states that allows it than MN could charge you with conspiracy to commit the act but not the act itself. To be charged and convicted you would need:
- Proof that you were pregnant
- Proof that you had an A and not that it was a miscarriage.
- A DA that would be willing to charge such a case.
- A jury to agree with such an interpretation.
- Lower courts that would support the decision because it would be appealed.
Those first two are near impossible to prove in the court of law. The case would end back at the supreme court. If your state is willing to interpret that law to include the big A and you disagree with it and want to keep your options open than I would suggest moving just to be on the safe side. Or simply write your legislatures, enough people writing and you can change the law.
The only people I have heard talk about such a thing are those who fear said law might be passed. And the fear mongering to sell views on media. The truth is there are very few blanket bans I have not see a single one (but I have not gone trough every state so there may be.) Nearly all states that have “banned it” have several exceptions or have a date of 10+ weeks (it looks like heart beat is going to be common.) As the majority of A’s are done by pill within that time period the majority of people don’t even have to worry about traveling out of state.
Hi. I’m a transgender man (FtM). I’m very familiar with trans exclusionary radical feminist rhetoric which is weaponized against trans people. If you use a trans exclusionary radical feminist rhetoric, I’m going to point out that it’s used as a weapon against trans people. Because if someone is somehow asking that question for other reasons (I don’t know why anyone would) they can walk it back and get better. If someone is asking from a place of hate trying to go under the radar, it’s pointed out. I never said you were a transphobe, I said you were using trans exclusionary radical feminist rhetoric.
As an ally to “them folks” you should know that question is weaponized against trans people or at the very least listen to trans people when they point out something is problematic.
I already answered your question. Twice.
If you can’t understand simple, plain, and precice English, that’s no my problem, it’s a you problem.
1 Like
Well after the recent FINA ruling, a woman is a biological female, transgender people still important though they get their own category to compete in now and stuff
why would you want to identify as the most oppressed sex of all the sexes there are and how did this become a talk about sex when its about a game…
The most oppressed sex? Intersex?
1 Like
Wow, all the way back to using nukes in WW2 to save millions of American and Japanese lives. Rational. And while I’m not sure what an “infastructial” system is, I’m sure you don’t understand the context of infrastructure ratings or you wouldn’t be citing that. You clearly don’t understand unemployment rates or you wouldn’t be claiming ours is ever-increasing. If by “identity crisis” you mean “identity politics” we can agree that it’s a major issue, but it’s hardly one specific to the U.S. and is, in fact, becoming more prevalent elsewhere.
Oh, yes, the U.S. hasn’t learned or evolved or changed or solved or, gosh, anything. Again, very rational.
And yet we are at the core of the order and systems that underpin your country’s ability to be as it is. I’m sorry your inability to understand basic facts or think rationally about the U.S. causes you to hate us.