Deleted Thread

I’m not having this issue although I have 32 gb of ram but everything else is the same I think.

My 7 year old HP with a crappy GeForce 960 does just fine.

1 Like

Ryzen does not like single channel, so that is possibly creating a CPU bottleneck. The other thing is your system could be thermal throttling.

1 Like

I think i got a great deal then only payed 250 dollars plus tax for my RTX 3060 ti feels good man !:slight_smile:

Well, your screen size and resolution are two different things, but you’re only missing out on 309,600 pixels, its whatever makes you happy though.

2 Likes

I think among builders 16GB has been the baseline for a while now, since at least 2016/2017. Most people I see building these days don’t drop below 32GB. It’s overkill for a lot of people but it also means you won’t have to think about it for a long time.

Prebuilts lag behind builder trends by a few years though so it’s not surprising to see newish machines ship with 8GB.

Monitors with that resolution max out at it, they’re not capable of displaying 1920x1080. OP would need to buy a new monitor.

1 Like

Yeah, people over hype GPU’s

I also don’t max everything out because I already find the game too visually busy.

Try Mac? M2 runs very nicely!

Dragonflight Performance Issues - Community / General Discussion - World of Warcraft Forums (blizzard.com)

There’s almost no point in getting a 4090 if you’re running an old dual core CPU.

Looking at my, list of Modes I have 1680 x 1050 and 1920 by 1080. But I understand what you mean. As he might be restricted to that based on his monitor.

Well, they’ve stated that they are.

maybe server lag. during launch i had the issue where im lagging so bad while other people including my friend had no lag at all. different servers though but both were very populated realms in general

1 Like

Crazy to think how long quad core has been the baseline for non-budget desktops. You’ve gotta go back before the original Core i series (i5-750/i7-970) which is ancient history at this point.

You should really buy a 1080p monitor at the very least to match your rig. It’s essentially like having a mid tier Mercedes/BMW/Tesla, but using cheap $60 tires that can’t keep you on the road.

Really hindering your own performance.

I just didn’t have any specs of the Monitor, but when he said 1680 x 1050 monitors “with” that modes are limited to that, I was stating that I am actually able to change my Mode to that but also be at 1080.

It doesn’t hinder my performance and I’m very comfortable with it. I have no need for a larger monitor, it doesn’t impact my ability to play a game personally.

Smaller resolutions also additionally improve performance in FPS.

Yes it does. Your cpu/graphics card are meant to handle much more then you are allowing it to, even 1080p is kind of average for an RTX card. 1080-1440p will allow you actually “see” what you paid for.

You don’t really know what you’re talking about. Reduced resolutions make it easier for your PC to perform.

It can run everything at a higher resolution, but I’m not going out of my way to buy a bigger monitor just to “see” what I paid for, because I see what I paid for every time I can play a game at 60 FPS and I haven’t had a single game yet where I couldn’t.