Wise words, but don’t say them out loud, or you’ll be called stupid or worse.
Blizzard released a rushed rework for the Shaman in the open beta because they realized they hadn’t done any iteration or testing during the closed beta, particularly for the Shaman and the Hero talents, and now people are just dealing with it.
They released commendable design intentions, aligning with my viewpoint of having Fire, Lightning, and Weaver as distinct builds. But that’s not what we got. Fire is dead and still intertwined with Lightning, which still has to use Lava Burst and Lighting use lava
Now, asking for a complete rework, we all know it can’t happen by August 27th. However, it could happen in Season 2, after 3 months. Blizzard has already stated that expansions will have faster cycles—no more than two years, but closer to one year.
People talk about tuning, but then insult those who ask for the same attention that other classes have received over the years, like Rogue, Hunter, Warlock, Mage, etc. We get stuck with a one-button build (which is fine if it’s Lightning, at least for me).
Some argue that the problem is having one specialization with three builds. They even created a fourth specialization for Druids, so why can’t we have that? Instead, we’re pitted against each other when, in reality, we should be asking Blizzard/Microsoft for more. They claim to have 7-8 million active players per month and generate around 91 million euros per month. With that kind of budget and time, they say they can’t do a rework? Then the problem isn’t with me; it’s with those who accept less.
We’re stuck with old animations (like Lightning Bolt and Ascendance), invisible effects (Earth Shock, Frost Shock, and Flame Shock), and a class that tries to make a Christmas dinner with just three ingredients. With the profits they make, they could feed a third-world nation, and you’re telling me it can’t be done? The problem lies with those who accept this, not with me.