All this “retail player tourists”.
Noone talks about how bad bfa was received and how much of those “huge retail player numbers” coming to classic are.
What does the “masterpiece” called bfa still have when it comes to subs? 1-2 million tops.
Classic is fishing out of a vanilla pool of 8 million players, a bc pool of 11 million and wrath pool with its close to 13 million active players.
On top of all that you have people who never tried it or player later expansions + a few retail tourists.
Suggesting anything but multiple millions of players in the first month is unrealistic, giving all the numbers.
Go ahead and compare wow classic with wow bfa in google trends. Bfa is way way way down there in the nothing since release.
What happens next is, if the game is good enough, to make the players stay subbed.
People here say it wont do that, that classic, as some posters here said, aint a good enough game.
And then you look up OG WoW and see that its up there in the list of the best games of all time.
So good that people were willing to go to shady unofficial sites, download gigabytes of data from whothehellknows to play on a bugged version of their favorite game where all the time investement can be for nothing in a matter of days/months. Where there is most likely corruption and other things increasingly disturbing the gameflow.
But still hundrets of thousand people went through that, and thats not because its free, its because its the superior game… even in an unofficial and devistated state.
If it where for money, why arent other privates of cata+ any successful? Cause theyre bad from the get go. Even when without bugs.
I wouldnt be suprised if classic becomes and stays more successfull by subnumbers than bfa with word of mouth advertisment alone.
Actually I would bet on that.
I bet on the better game, and anyone with any sense at all should do the same.