I’m surprised Rdruid’s “buffs” are so light here compared to rsham and hpriest considering that our throughput is worse than theirs despite being the cookie cutter “throughput healer”.
Sucks being a throughput healer with bad throughput because of our gutted ramp and not getting tuned up when we’re clearly underperforming. Hpal deserves the same, but at least they have a DR and way more raid utility.
That’s because they massively buffed cat damage before the season started. I’d take some cat damage nerfs for some hps buffs for raid, and it’s not even a hard decision.
Player count wise, yes. If you actually look at throughput numbers though, no.
Having a raid buff will of course meant you’re brought more than a class without one. Does that mean our tuning should be strictly worse? Because rshamans already do more healing than rdruids on all mythic fights except for Volcaross and Nymue-- and Volcaross is a joke boss for that matter.
I’m not saying that rshaman and hpriest don’t deserve buffs, just that rdruid deserves throughput buffs along with them in ways that help us in raid but don’t make us more broken in M+.
…If you think having mark of the wild is the same as having a DR cooldown as well as blessings to offer utility, I don’t know what to tell you.
Why are MW monks allowed to do the absurd things they do in that case? They also bring a raid buff with mystic touch. What about hpriests and disc priests bringing fort? Should that also be considered?
Rdruid aside from the raid buff is a pure throughput healer and should not be near the bottom of the meters. Not sure what backpedaling you perceive or why I’m bothering to argue with a 1/9M tribalistic rshaman who clearly doesn’t want other healers to be buffed, but again: I don’t care about M+ balance. You clearly do, which is why you’re taking this absurd argumentative tone.
Because again, all underperformers should be buffed. You seem to think only hpriest and rshaman deserve it for some reason, but rdruid and hpal also could use more throughput.