This legendary is BIS for havoc for single target.
But why did you guys have to add RNG to this legendary?
I “almost” top the meter when stars align (when we get lust, meta and back to back Chaos Theory procs at the same time). But the next pull, I barely pull ahead of tanks because I don’t get any procs and demon blade barely generates any fury.
How do you compete with other classes if we rely on RNG on top of RNG when we have to do mechanics and switch targets in the raid? Like I get a proc as soon as Sludgefist starts channeling Destructive Stomp? Like when Hungering Destroyer casts Expunge or the blue thingy on me?
Do Blizzard devs or testers actually play Havoc at a competitive level right now? I don’t really get why this class got butchered so hard since Legion. We went from the best single target burst class to RNG based underperforming single target class. I miss the Legion Chaos Theory that gave us insane burst for like 12 sec.
Why can’t the current Chaos Theory just proc 100% after using Blade Dance and make it last 4 seconds instead of 8 seconds so that we can plan our moves ahead?
10 Likes
Could not agree more, this legendary feels awful from a practical standpoint. No reliability whatsoever, which means no consistency, which means no ability to plan it into your rotation, which means constant frustration.
I actually hate using it. I’m honestly very disappointed with legendary items in general. Most of them don’t seem to make meaningful changes to the way the game is played or are simply so bad you literally can’t think of a scenario in which it could be useful. But yeah, Chaos Theory absolutely needs to be changed, hell, change the name too if you need to.
3 Likes
Chaos theory should be a 100% proc chance when you eye beam.
Mvqdh suggested this and it makes sense, It lets DH plan their burst windows and line it up better. It also synergizes with the eyebeam haste. It might lead to less overall procs but it will feel a lot better than the current RnG element.
4 Likes
Dh always rng. What is problem, just because affliction beat u single target don’t be upset, you were beating them 4 months ago.
The 30% proc rate doesn’t feel rewarding.
2 Likes
Look I do agree, that I would like more flavor into our rotation and much less RNG, but the class is still holding onto its base characteristics. I like the idea of having another ability or two to fit into the rotation, but I feel like blizzard probably has plans, ( Borrowed Power) for us to take advantage of. I mean, just imagine what would happen if they decide to let us equip two legs at once, The not so much liked Chaos theory would be the answer to your eyebeam fantasies.
1 Like
pooling fury before casting blade dance is hard
1 Like
Yeah I hate the design of RNG chaos theory, opted to go double eye beam… it’s more fun and pumps in mythic+
1 Like
I’m not following.
Who doesn’t like chaos theory? What are my eye beam fantasies? Can’t remember the last time I took a moment to fantasize about eye beam. Why would I imagine two legendaries at once as if that’s remotely relevant to baseline dh design issues?
There is a Warrior Mortal Strike Legendary that only has a 15% chance of triggering. We aren’t the only ones with low chance leggos. I just don’t like how i have to choose between spending too much for blade dance or not utilizing Chaos Theory very well
I use the 15% double hand of Gul’Dan on my lock and or works as that’s my shard dump anyhow…but honestly with my DH if I’m playing Havoc…I usually prefer not going with first blood for those sweet sweet eyebeams
Why would you want to have it linked to eye beam? Unless you run the cycle build, which isn’t fun at all least from my experience, you are looking at getting the proc every 30s. We also already have a leggo that goes off of eye beam so why double up leggos onto one ability? I do feel they should increase the proc chance but from my experience I get some solid procs off of CT with a solid amount of haste.
Personally I would have liked to see a leggo that would have given us the inner demon proc that eventually was made into UBC and then taken away. I think there was one but it never made it far and I think it was buggy.
Dont reply to me with your nonsense Haugs im simply responding to others and not stating my own opinion.
I do like CT and i dont have eyebeam fantasies, if you actually read my response in context like an intellectual human being you would have realized i was not referring to myself.
1 Like
Yes, let’s discuss reading comprehension and implementing it properly in conversation.
You are still ignorant to what it was relaying. I see you always on these forums, trying to piece in your opinion, and instead of helping people, half the time you make yourself look like a know-it-all.
You have gathered a rep in my eyes, a rep of someone annoying.
3 Likes
Not trying to be extremely rude or anything, but you did reply to something from 7 days ago, for some reason. And the input you gave was not in any way comedic or helpful just quite sassy.
Now in the case of my reply to your comment, that you originally replied to, it was meant to be comedic, not requiring any sass. 
also have to have a macro that /Yell I am my scars!