If you don’t apply your own standards to yourself, you have none either.
No.
It means you arent worth trying to convince.
No one said we cant “prove” it. We are saying you are not here honestly. So proving it to you, is not worth it.
When a person shows they are only interested in trolling, they are not a person others will flock to convince they are wrong. Because they have a deliberate history of showing they are not here to honestly participate in the discussion. There is nothing we could show you to prove any point. We know this, because you are here trolling.
You dismiss anything that disagrees with you. You refuse to ever elaborate yourself, while stating others have to.
If you were here to have an honest conversation, people would be more than willing to show their work. We know this, because they already have. Its been shown to you time and time again. But…because you have shown you have no urge to do anything but sit there being a hypocrite…it doesnt matter.
Except one of my standards is not to waste time trying to convince a person who is here to troll.
I will waste time pointing out how you are trolling. How you are here to derail the conversation. How you are here to push double standards. But engage in thoughtful conversation with a person that goes out of their way to not?
7 Likes
Except the people asking for this forums to work like the other Blizz forums have legitimacy that you sorely lack. We can point to an example of how it works just fine elsewhere in just about every forum out there. All you have are nonsensical scenarios you dug out of your rear end and demand everyone to take them seriously despite the fact that you absolutely refuse to show your work or give an example.
You just want to bully people into deferring to you and silencing themselves from disagreeing and pointing out how much nothing you have here.
4 Likes
If this all boils down to a matter of faith based off a blues off handed quotes, I have none from what I’ve seen from the pro-supporters today.
The issue here is…Why should anyone try to convince you?
Would you care to elaborate on why anyone should repeat themselves with you? Since the information has been posted to you before.
5 Likes
Direct response to a question posed to them.
4 Likes
You haven’t even made reference to it so it seems I have to.
You’re so busy trying to make me the enemy that you’ve forgotten the point of this post.
Which I am still convinced won’t work.
Why?
Why do you think that when you ignore someone, it should ignore their entire account…why do you feel that will not work?
Cause posters will still fight each other over…anything.
How will they fight if one is ignored?
2 Likes
They won’t use it.
You’ve seen it plenty of times before, I know how you dismiss the inconvenient fact. I’m not gonna go digging in the CS forum because you’re gonna pretend you haven’t had this pointed out to you before several times in this thread.
No one’s saying you have to believe. Just that no one takes your nonsensical scenarios you present for why it’s important not to fix the glaring broken bit of the forum when you can’t be bothered to do anything to try and persuade others that you’re serious.
Oh right, and there’s the “Ard brings up a thing that has 0 to do with why people are requesting this to pretend it makes it meaningless.”
6 Likes
Which makes it all irrelevant.
This is about the ignore functionality. “Someone might not use it” is not a rational response to saying it will not work.
Of course things wont work if you do not use them.
Thats like me saying that at this moment, my car is broke. My car does not work. because I am not using it.
Sure. If I go out to my car and use my keys. Crank it. It works completely fine. But because I am not actively using it right this second…it does not work?
Thats not how it works.
5 Likes
The reason Ard hasn’t been convinced by anything is that he doesn’t want to be.
There’s a principal in statistics where if you have a large enough set of random data, you can make it show any pattern you want, provided you ignore all the stuff that doesn’t support the pattern.
This is what Ard is doing.
9 Likes
It’s just a matter of time til we get account wide ignores. I already know the fox’s, L’s and a few others Btags. When it happens, they will be the first to be ignored.
1 Like
I mean, that seems a bit elaborate. Ard’s doing more of the using a sharpie to draw “Then a bad things happens” on the chart of the data and act like it proves him right.
3 Likes
Well we don’t know when the next Plunderstorm will come along, and I guarantee more than afew people aren’t going to be happy with one another regardless of having an account wide ignore at their disposal or not.
Can you try to stick to the topic?
6 Likes
What does that have to do with anything I said?
Do you just have a spinning wheel of buzzwords?
People not being happy with some content has nothing to do with ignore functionality.
8 Likes
lol I elaborate and you say I’m off topic…I can’t get anywhere with you lot.