i think its perfectly fine to have a total and complete ignore between both parties.
2 Likes
A lot of us don’t . In fact once we have ignored a person we prefer they didn’t see us either.
I’m not disagreeing with your point, I’m making another one. I’m glad you get it, Sath. Malgorok needs to turn down the 'tude because it’s completely unnecessary.
1 Like
You’re just ignoring it entirely and have yet to answer the question I asked
So yea, can’t disagree with something if you refuse to acknowledge it
we just explained why it would be a good idea. we do still respect your opinion.
me and sable arent the only ones saying it should work this way.
so people are saying let them be ignored, but stop have the option to see what the ignored person has said? we can already do can’t we? it’s the same as flagging stuff.
though idk why you are opening a person you ignored posts. defeats the purpose dont it? lol
The problem with person 1 being able to block person 2 from seeing them and vice versa, is that it doesn’t actually stop person 1 from talking about person 2. It just stops person 2 from being able to see it, protest or protect themselves without assistance from someone else in the thread.
Unless I’m misreading your suggestion here.
I want a more well-rounded consequence from account-wide ignore than there would be by default. That is the point I’m making. I’m making a suggestion…you know…a FUNCTION of a forum, this has nothing to do with me CONTROLLING anything.
If you ignore someone’s account then you no longer see their posts. That is the default behavior. What I want to see…which it looks like I’m getting some buy-in from others is that this should also mean the person you IGNORED doesn’t see YOUR posts either. This seems (to me) to be more fair and I’ve already explained why.
i guess if you feel that way, should we just remove the ignore function completely then?
I think what they are saying is if you ignore a person not only do their posts get hidden from you but your posts get hidden from them as well
1 Like
Why does there need to be a consequence for ignoring someone?
Also still haven’t answered my question
So yea, ggnore, plenty of reasons have been given to not pay attention to low level alts
Make sure to stop trolling the thread btw since you’re not supposed to be able to read my posts in your dream world so you can’t be here anymore, don’t be a hypocrite
Bye
Because we may have a disagreement on a thread subject but not on another subject ,if a person wishes to ignore that person than the person that person shouldn’t see that persons post the same around. It 'll cool any argument if there is one.
I dont have you on ignore, I can handle your attitude even if it’s unnecessary (I work with some pretty “diva” clients all day long for good money for a living, so this is nothing compared to what I’ve dealt with before).
I’m also not TROLLING anything. I’m contributing to the conversation without devolving into personal attacks or snide comments.
One of the reasons I have against account-wide ignore is again…the consequence it’s had on people in general. They really struggle to have any conversation that has any twinge of conflict at all in their lives b/c they’re too used to just being able to shut off what displeases them rather than learn how to self-manage. I don’t support tech continuing to further this behavior in people. It’s also why I think trigger warnings and safe spaces don’t belong in anything other than environments for children.
So again, if people want this…it should be more well-rounded. I don’t think its fair to make a person who is being ignored by someone “feel” it in any way. The ignorer doens’t see the posts of the ignoree (is that a word? LOL) and the person being ignored doesn’t see the ignorer’s posts either. There should be no continued potential for conflict between the two and the person doing the ignoring doesn’t “win” anything.
so hows that gonna work? we’ll just reset the “ignore” on every topic? because if you argue me here, block me, now we cant see each other then its VERY pointless bc ima still see you on the next topic and know you blocked me lol.
3 Likes
It would apply to the thread only not the whole forum,if they did follow you will know CoC can be applied. Since you can’t derail a subject anyway.
1 Like
Yea after so many posts asked a simple question and never even trying to answer it once and instead making up scenarios kinda confirms to not take them seriously
Sure they may not be “trolling” but they’re certainty not worth dealing with anymore cuz well yea, same quality as mr 7th alt in here
3 Likes
Nah, they are trolling. They are asking for complete control so they can ignore everyone, nobody see there post, then nobody can flag them when they create topics or post that violates the forum Code of Conduct.
3 Likes
Trolling is intentionally trying to stir conflict with no end-game or intention OTHER than that. The problem with this term is that it’s too subjective and now everyone just uses it to refer to anyone who disagrees with them and they just don’t buy/agree with their arguments. Must be nice to have such black and white life philosophies. This is also kinda how “Karen” has morphed to now just mean anyone that is complaining about anything…even when they’re in the right.
1 Like
Yea I don’t think anyone should be able to control what other people see
That’s actually a significant step up from a simple account wide ignore
Although if thats what they want, shouldn’t they voluntarily leave this thread since they don’t want to be able to read my posts anymore and I made this thread? Kinda hypocritical if they don’t
2 Likes