Continuing the discussion from Can we finally get playable the high elves? (Part 1) - #5045 by Mevanou-wyrmrest-accord.
Previous discussions:
Continuing the discussion from Can we finally get playable the high elves? (Part 1) - #5045 by Mevanou-wyrmrest-accord.
Previous discussions:
As I was saying
IIRC the argument is that the ambient mana in Outland was more arcane than fel
That said I think a mix (blue, green AND purple because of the Draenei reliquary they were graverobbing for sustenance) would be acceptable if we reduce the basic color coding.
From the last thread.
I wish they’d give us a better explanation on Purple. I mean I like giving it whatever meaning I want (Arcane, Void, whatever) but it would be nice to get more info.
Also I want red for fire mages and my blood elves who work with the Dark Anima…
Even the System wants the debate about High Elves to keep going.
my mage is a fire mage since that way I can honor Kael the best. He made the spec popular.
The system doesn’t want anything.
It just does what its told to.
Automated systems are just complicated rocks.
The one canon example with explanation, afaik, other than void elves themselves is Valeera.
Though technically didn’t he canonically use a lot of felish stuff back in WCIII? Did they retcon that about Bloodmage?
I don’t think its technically canon. its shown up twice though.
In her case didn’t she draw upon fel at that time though?
Vereesa also had purple in a hearthstone card and that was ascribed to Arcane for sure.
We all know the System has a thing for High Elves.
We really still pretending like you can’t already be a high elf with the customization we got?
Remember the only difference was eye color
My pet rock also has a thing for pringles but I don’t put a lot of stock in something I made up.
YES you can! But you have to play for the horde as a Blood Elf.
We were just discussing this before it switched over…
Its not the eye color. thats just whatever magic you’re near to or using a lot of.
What the difference is is political and semi cultural.
Can my void elf get more non balding hairstyles?
If he could get this delicious night elf hairstyle that elmy has I’d be set
Right now my solution to the balding, is also the best IRL solution: a hat that’s so distracting you don’t notice the balding
I don’t know how to quote over from different threads.
But to reply to your last post: I guess I just haven’t been paying attention (per HE Paladins). I mean with as few remain paladins as there were for a time, I’m not surprised if they wouldn’t be pulling them from basically anywhere, and HE’s are associated with priest to me (because of WC3 or maybe 2? I’m old my memory is shot).
But that said, I personally still don’t see Paladin as a HE “must have” class. But that’s just my opinion. I think it’s fine if people want HE paladins even if it’s not a traditional class.
Heck give Paladin to VE’s for all I care. I already have an Man’ari Paladin and a Light-Forged Death Knight. Why not a Void Elf Paladin. (I will make them the most void-y looking Void Elf I can possible make. Really wreck that lore xD)
The void elves are essentially high elves. We don’t need any more elves in this game.
That will teach me from assuming anything that shows up in HS is canon
Basically do as if you were quoting in the previous post, copy the reply and do it in the new thread.
I agreed in your other thread requesting that but void elves need new access to more hairstyles, also given a lot of blood elf NPCs still use night elf styles that were never given to blood elf PCs that, also should be added
Basically, broadly, I think Nightborne, Night Elf, Blood Elf and Void Elf getting a customization pass would be a good time to cross customizations between the 4 a lot more.
So pretty much nothing player wise then?
Go be a high elf then champ
Otherwise known as irrelevant.
Playable high elves already exist. You people are ridiculous, embarrassing, and childish.