Can Alliance Get Villain Batted Now Please?

I really wanna go full on morally Greymane. I wanna take a page from the Scarlet Crusade and just start purging the Horde for its crimes against the Alliance. It’s not fair that the Horde are the only ones allowed to be the “bad guys”. I wanna flood Orgrimmar, and light Thunder Bluff ablaze. Maybe even retake Silvermoon for the Alliance.

Just none of that civil war business. Instead, let’s just depose Anduin and those that’d support his pacifistic regime. And then let the Alliance war machine kick into full gear.

The Night Elves deserve their revenge. The Void Elves deserve their home. The Worgen deserve justice.

Make it happen Blizzard!

32 Likes

You don’t get to have your toxic masculinity, you’re a Golden child.

44 Likes

We’ll hopefully either get a villain out of Greymane or Tyrande. Probably Tyrande but it will probably be an it’s not her fault because it was the Night Warrior which would suck ):

2 Likes

No thanks.

The Horde is waiting for you if you want that kind of thing.

7 Likes

As long as we don’t have an already evil Warchief, go right ahead.

I’d love to tap into some of that sweet moral high ground you’ve been enjoying.

20 Likes

That’s not how this works. You can get to be the aggressor but you will gain nothing tangible, your characters will be killed, and you will ultimately return to Anduin because he knows best and war is bad.

38 Likes

As nice as the moral high ground is, it’s not quite as enjoyable as actually being able to do stuff.

I’d rather fight the Horde who have caused my faction tons of problems, instead of trying to find the good guys in them and saying all is forgiven. Cause it’s not. Nothing is forgiven.

Saurfang himself invaded Ashenvale. Why would I be okay with fighting alongside him?

18 Likes

I mean, we’ve got plenty of characters that cod use some dying
Most notably the High King himself

10 Likes

I’m not sure you folks are prepared for how this would actually work out.

Genn and Tyrande will spearhead the war.

In all likelihood, by the war’s end, one will be dead and the other will have apologized to Anduin for being a bad bad warmonger.

38 Likes

It’d be a win-win for everyone. The Horde would feel better about fighting the Alliance, instead of being blatantly the villains. And the Alliance would feel like they were dispensing justice.

6 Likes

Anduin has plot armor until he’s like 80. Whoever is pro-war and opposing him will be the one to bite it.

5 Likes

Do keep the political buzzwords restricted to in-game politics.

2 Likes

Impeachment just means to formally accuse. Impeaching anduin won’t do diddly. Deposing him would.

Also, no. We won’t get villain batted, nor do I want us to. I play a good guy. I don’t need any of this BS to happen, and honestly, neither does the horde.

Ask for better writing. It’s a better request.

11 Likes

No one deserves the villain bat.

13 Likes

Fixed. And no. The Alliance deserves revenge and we should be allowed to go purging.

We wouldn’t be villains, as we would be justified in our eyes.

7 Likes

Well now we know the Light isn’t an infallible source of information, as seen with Illidan blasting Xe’ra to teeny bits. Hopefully the dystopian future Velen saw, too, was a lie.

7 Likes

This 100%. The grass isn’t always greener on the other side. Sure the Alliance would benefit from being more proactive and striking first but they need to remember that being villain-batted comes with all the drawbacks of being hit with said bat as well.

The first being that more of your characters will become prone to dying/becoming villains. Yes, this includes characters like Genn and Tyrande as well. Blizzard isn’t known for subtlety and nuance so I have no doubt in my mind that they will throw out all prior character development and fully commit to them being a Saturday morning cartoon villain like Garrosh and Sylvanas were.

The second is that their more diplomatic characters will become martyrs to stop said villains in a civil war. Anduin and Velen just to name a couple though I’m pretty positive that Anduin’s death would celebrated instead of mourned on this section of the forums. But still, the risk remains that beloved characters would get caught in the crossfire. It happened to my boy Cairne in Golden’s novel “The Shattering” after all and most recently, Saurfang in the War Campaign.

The third is that the real opinions of General population will be largely ignored and molded to fit the narrative instead. This means you will have soldiers acting completely ooc and start kicking puppies and burning down orphanages for no real reason. A prime example of this is Brennadam and Teldrassil on the Horde side.

And lastly, characters will start developing plot related amnesia and start coming up with loosely justified and all around terrible reasons for creating conflict. If you want an example of that Horde side go read the novella “A Good War”.

Are you absolutely certain you want all of this, Blue posters? The villain bat is a bundled deal, you don’t get to pick and choose. Which is why I’m trying to warn you all now.

Edit: Grammar and phrasing.

33 Likes

we wouldn’t be justified in my eyes. Genocide as a response to genocide is a great way to ensure everyone keeps killing each other. It’s gotta end somewhere.

9 Likes

Not in World of Warcraft, it doesn’t

4 Likes

I didn’t really want to play this card, but if the balance of the game is going to continue and playing alliance characters is going to continue to make sense in high end raid content, they’re going to have to let us play with the horde characters. Look at the mythic raiding numbers. Almost all of the high end guilds are horde.

but not just that… we’ve had war in warcraft without hamfisted faction conflicts. Literally every expansion has had threats to deal with that weren’t horde or alliance themed. The war in warcraft doesn’t have to mean war with the other faction.

9 Likes