Burst Nerfed, Alright -- that's fine; However,

Classes Warrior
1

I get it, I’m not even mad about it.

That being said, Fury’s sustained damage is low. Wouldn’t the sensible thing to do, be to transition some of that burst damage to their core rotation – or now that you have reduced the effectiveness of Bladestorm and Odyn’s Fury – lower their CD to match the new effectiveness, so that they can use them more frequently?

I’m not a developer or a math wizard, but I do play Fury a good bit – and chopping the top of their burst off isn’t a bad change. If anything it’s a great opportunity to spread that damage around to places they actually need it.

Playing Fury while their CD’s are down feels pretty bad. I get it – all specs have their own damage profiles, you guys want them to feel different. I get it.

I play almost every melee spec in this game. I’m rooting for all of them. I’d like to enjoy my Fury Warrior more in M+ and in Delves, but it’s consistent damage is too low. Now that you’ve nerfed the reason their consistent damage was so low – how about we help them out where they need it. Seems like a sensible thing to do.

6 Likes
2

Blizzard likes to measure once and cut twice, to modify the phrase. It is why I tell people trying to decide on a main, not to take something that is extra strong at the launch of an expansion because it is going to get the nerfbat in the groin.

2 Likes
3

Hear, hear!

1 Like
4

Or ST is crap and a 5 target cap is insulting.

5

Ya’ll are measurin’?
revs chainsaw

6

I mean, the way Blizzard measures is mixing SA and Imperial units, while eyeballing crosseyed.