Uhm no dude.
2400 is a moving target that has been 1800 in the past or facing AWC depending on seasons.
0.5% remains stable throughout.
2 Likes
Weird because 2400 is a static number, and you can not acquire glad below that.
So, Glad is 2400. This is how it works. Your opinion is not comparable to what it is, considering that’s the benchmark blizz put it at.
If Glad returned to a 0.5% reward, then you’re looking at glad consistently being around the 26-27cr mark, as it used to be.
But hey, what do I know, I can read how a reward is rewarded.
1 Like
Uhm, still no.
2400, or any rating can mean anything depending on participation or what blizz does.
So you can be 2300 this season, 2500 the next, or 2k in another while playing at the exact skill level or even better.
So no, 2400 does not represent a objective read of what glad is, since it changes all the time.
2 Likes
You’re talking about Glad as a skill measurement.
Rairai is talking about Glad as a statistical delineation of the populace.
No, hes talking about 2400 in absolute terms.
Glad as a skill lvl or as a % of population are the same.
i would agree with you but then we’d both be wrong
Nah, wed both be right.
“Im top 0.5%” is a direct link to skill level in a given population.
But explain away how it isnt, im curious.
Oh I’m far too stupid to actually argue. Sorry, you won’t be learning anything out of me lol
Well. Fair enough.
1 Like
For those saying MMR is in a good spot, that might be the case for DPS. But for healers in RSS at least make MMR equal to DPS which is at least 200 points lower at the moment and has always been 200-300 points lower than DPS for most of Dragonflight.