agreed, marks and sv are much more healthy for pvp than bm
You can disarm and stop marks damage. SV isnât super easy to just pick up and play at a high level from nothing. Bm being better than both in all situations is just bad. Shout out to hog, but most long term PvP hunter players donât want to play bm as a primary spec. Bm meta isnât fun for them or for people who donât play hunter. Itâs fine if itâs viable with appropriate damage because someone is just good at hunter and wants to play it. It shouldnât be tuned such that itâs the default with damage so high that you can be bad at hunter and still just win because itâs fury warrior with 40 yard arms.
Itâs not stomp, Black Arrow is the majority of it. Stomp is like minimal damage typically. Most games my top 2 damage is Black Arrow and Barbed Shot DoT with pets following that.
its black arrow not stomp
This sounds like a binding agreement.
I raid tomorrow, but we can Q any other day this week!
nvm things changed
This is why you donât design range specs that has 0 casting to interrupt (I get it itâs a hunter) but at least give it some weakness to how easy it can gets off damage.
Itâs a pseudo range fury warr with better defensives.
u mean to tell me creating a 40 yard melee was a mistake?
if those mop devs still worked at blizzard theyâd be very upset with you
Granted itâs strength currently is probably more to do with how often black arrows is going off than anything else.
If it wasnât for black arrows donât think we probably see bm this much.
Could be wrong though.
You are pretty much on point.
The fact the damage cant be stopped is mind blowing. Idk how anyone can ever defend the spec as it is right now.
At least if 50%+ of the damage was in the pets, you could CC them or something.
But black arrow and barbed shot doing this much is insanity. Who okayed this. My god its obnoxious