You don’t say?
But the reasoning is exactly the same: I don’t want to earn it, I’m willing to pay for it, so gimme.
No thanks, little girl. I’m not interested in Troll Scout cookies.
It isn’t, in the slightest.
Not even samoans?
pls, and ty.
The slippery slope fallacy only applies when the reasoning does not follow. The slippery slope in this case is real and proven to exist. See: #somechanges being Blizzard’s philosophy for TBC, when previously it was #nochanges for Classic. The escalation of changes is demonstrable.
I presented no false dichotomy, so either/or fallacy doesn’t apply. The guy even admitted as such: he has no argument. He says he doesn’t need one. Thus, my dichotomy was correct, not false.
What I said was relevant to the discussion, so red herring fallacy doesn’t apply. I’m just pointing out the flawed logic by arguing in favor of something any normal person would find objectionable. Didn’t work too well, though. The guy honestly was cool with it so long as it makes Blizzard money which is… really sad.
It’s not. And seeing as how TBCC isn’t even out yet that second part is an outright lie.
i did my best trying to show him where the flaws in his argument were, so we could have an actual discussion. you saw how he responded though. sigh.
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.